PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TILL vs. WEAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TILL vs. WEAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) and Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TILL vs. WEAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TILL
Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF
8.82%-5.97%-13.98%-5.00%-12.66%
WEAT
Teucrium Wheat Fund
14.52%-17.14%-19.26%-25.19%-35.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TILL achieves a 8.82% return, which is significantly lower than WEAT's 14.52% return.


TILL

1D
-0.17%
1M
4.82%
YTD
8.82%
6M
6.30%
1Y
-0.98%
3Y*
-5.59%
5Y*
10Y*

WEAT

1D
0.18%
1M
4.67%
YTD
14.52%
6M
9.95%
1Y
-2.68%
3Y*
-13.75%
5Y*
-5.03%
10Y*
-6.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TILL vs. WEAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TILL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than WEAT's 1.91% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TILL vs. WEAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TILL
TILL Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
TILL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILL Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILL Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
TILL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILL Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

WEAT
WEAT Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
WEAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEAT Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
WEAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEAT Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TILL vs. WEAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) and Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TILLWEATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.09

-0.13

+0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.04

-0.05

+0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

0.99

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

-0.17

+0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.12

-0.27

+0.16

TILL vs. WEAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TILL Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is higher than the WEAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TILL and WEAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TILLWEATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

-0.13

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.54

-0.41

-0.12

Correlation

The correlation between TILL and WEAT is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TILL vs. WEAT - Dividend Comparison

TILL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, while WEAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022
TILL
Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF
4.56%4.97%2.55%51.24%0.73%
WEAT
Teucrium Wheat Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TILL vs. WEAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TILL drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, smaller than the maximum WEAT drawdown of -84.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILL and WEAT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TILLWEATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.76%

-84.32%

+50.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.94%

-17.85%

+7.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.97%

-81.96%

+54.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.15%

-62.91%

+41.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.33%

11.30%

-4.97%

Volatility

TILL vs. WEAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) is 5.78%, while Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) has a volatility of 9.32%. This indicates that TILL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WEAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TILLWEATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.78%

9.32%

-3.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.55%

14.83%

-6.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.56%

20.22%

-8.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.64%

30.48%

-15.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.64%

26.73%

-12.09%