CANE vs. SOYB
CANE (Teucrium Sugar Fund) and SOYB (Teucrium Soybean Fund) are both Agricultural Commodities funds from Teucrium - CANE tracks the Teucrium Sugar Fund Benchmark while SOYB tracks the Teucrium Soybean Fund Benchmark. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CANE returned -2.68%/yr vs 3.22%/yr for SOYB. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 1.88% expense ratio.
Performance
CANE vs. SOYB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CANE achieves a -1.38% return, which is significantly lower than SOYB's 15.10% return. Over the past 10 years, CANE has underperformed SOYB with an annualized return of -2.68%, while SOYB has yielded a comparatively higher 3.22% annualized return.
CANE
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- 6M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- -1.38%
- 1Y
- -11.17%
- 3Y*
- -10.64%
- 5Y*
- 2.41%
- 10Y*
- -2.68%
- ALL TIME*
- -6.25%
SOYB
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- 6M
- 13.13%
- YTD
- 15.10%
- 1Y
- 18.62%
- 3Y*
- -3.34%
- 5Y*
- 1.71%
- 10Y*
- 3.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.17%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.32M | $1.65M | $3.43M | |
| $1.57M | $2.15M | $2.74M |
CANE vs. SOYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CANE Teucrium Sugar Fund | -1.38% | -14.65% | -7.79% | 30.06% | 3.59% | 36.30% | -3.85% | -0.97% | -27.52% | -24.76% |
SOYB Teucrium Soybean Fund | 15.10% | 1.77% | -20.48% | -5.23% | 25.27% | 16.85% | 22.99% | -2.16% | -9.51% | -6.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between CANE and SOYB is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2011 | 0.18 |
The correlation between CANE and SOYB shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.21 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CANE vs. SOYB — Risk / Return Rank
CANE
SOYB
CANE vs. SOYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) and Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CANE | SOYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.25 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 2.13 | -2.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | 5.60 | -6.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CANE vs. SOYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CANE drawdown since its inception was -81.30%, which is greater than SOYB's maximum drawdown of -53.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CANE and SOYB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CANE | SOYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.30% | -53.76% | -27.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.82% | -8.78% | -11.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.73% | -30.61% | -11.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.73% | -31.01% | -10.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.29% | -33.93% | -33.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.44% | -14.16% | -49.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.56% | -25.64% | -30.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.33% | 3.33% | +10.00% |
Volatility
CANE vs. SOYB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) is 5.03%, while Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that CANE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CANE | SOYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.03% | 5.47% | -0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.18% | 10.13% | +6.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.20% | 13.37% | +6.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.92% | 17.12% | +3.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.58% | 16.70% | +4.88% |
CANE vs. SOYB - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CANE and SOYB have an expense ratio of 1.88%.
Dividends
CANE vs. SOYB - Dividend Comparison
Neither CANE nor SOYB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CANE and SOYB have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOYB has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to CANE (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CANE dropped -81.30% vs SOYB's -53.76%.
On 10-year performance, SOYB leads with 3.22% vs -2.68% for CANE. Both ETFs have the same 1.88% expense ratio. On volatility, CANE has been the lower-risk option at 5.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOYB has performed better with a 3.22% return vs -2.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CANE and SOYB have the same expense ratio: 1.88% per year.
CANE and SOYB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
CANE tracks Teucrium Sugar Fund Benchmark, while SOYB tracks Teucrium Soybean Fund Benchmark.
SOYB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CANE and SOYB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer