TILL vs. SOYB
TILL (Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF) and SOYB (Teucrium Soybean Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - TILL is a Commodities fund actively managed by Teucrium, while SOYB is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Soybean Fund Benchmark. TILL is actively managed, while SOYB is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TILL returned -5.51%/yr vs -0.07%/yr for SOYB. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TILL charges 0.89%/yr vs 1.88%/yr for SOYB.
Performance
TILL vs. SOYB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TILL achieves a 6.30% return, which is significantly lower than SOYB's 12.90% return.
TILL
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -6.04%
- YTD
- 6.30%
- 6M
- 4.59%
- 1Y
- 0.28%
- 3Y*
- -5.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOYB
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- YTD
- 12.90%
- 6M
- 6.01%
- 1Y
- 14.47%
- 3Y*
- -0.07%
- 5Y*
- 0.26%
- 10Y*
- 1.86%
TILL vs. SOYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF | 6.30% | -5.97% | -13.98% | -5.00% | -12.66% |
SOYB Teucrium Soybean Fund | 12.90% | 1.77% | -20.48% | -5.23% | 0.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between TILL and SOYB is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2022 | 0.67 |
The correlation between TILL and SOYB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TILL vs. SOYB — Risk / Return Rank
TILL
SOYB
TILL vs. SOYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) and Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TILL | SOYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.20 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | 1.65 | -1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.05 | 4.06 | -4.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TILL | SOYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 | 1.11 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.55 | 0.00 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
TILL vs. SOYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TILL drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, smaller than the maximum SOYB drawdown of -53.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILL and SOYB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TILL | SOYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.76% | -53.76% | +20.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.98% | -8.78% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.40% | -31.01% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.66% | -15.80% | -12.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.39% | -25.76% | +4.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.39% | 3.57% | +1.82% |
Volatility
TILL vs. SOYB - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) at 4.05%. This indicates that TILL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SOYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TILL | SOYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.35% | 4.05% | +1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.19% | 8.94% | +1.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.63% | 13.06% | -0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.73% | 18.00% | -3.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.73% | 16.98% | -2.25% |
TILL vs. SOYB - Expense Ratio Comparison
TILL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than SOYB's 1.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
TILL vs. SOYB - Dividend Comparison
TILL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, while SOYB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOYB Teucrium Soybean Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF | 4.67% | 4.97% | 2.55% | 51.24% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TILL and SOYB have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TILL has higher volatility (5.35%) compared to SOYB (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TILL dropped -33.76% vs SOYB's -53.76%.
On 3-year performance, SOYB leads with -0.07% vs -5.51% for TILL. On fees, TILL is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, SOYB has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOYB has performed better with a -0.07% return vs -5.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TILL is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.88% for SOYB.
TILL has the higher dividend yield at 4.67%, compared with 0.00% for SOYB.
TILL is categorized as Commodities, while SOYB is Agricultural Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for TILL and 1.88% for SOYB.
SOYB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TILL and SOYB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer