CANE vs. CAMT
CANE (Teucrium Sugar Fund) is Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Sugar Fund Benchmark, while CAMT (Camtek Ltd.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, CANE returned -2.68%/yr vs 48.82%/yr for CAMT. Their 0.03 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CANE vs. CAMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CANE achieves a -1.38% return, which is significantly lower than CAMT's 24.56% return. Over the past 10 years, CANE has underperformed CAMT with an annualized return of -2.68%, while CAMT has yielded a comparatively higher 48.82% annualized return.
CANE
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- 6M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- -1.38%
- 1Y
- -11.17%
- 3Y*
- -10.64%
- 5Y*
- 2.41%
- 10Y*
- -2.68%
- ALL TIME*
- -6.25%
CAMT
- 1D
- -3.48%
- 1M
- -7.05%
- 6M
- -9.60%
- YTD
- 24.56%
- 1Y
- 38.70%
- 3Y*
- 41.97%
- 5Y*
- 29.20%
- 10Y*
- 48.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.66%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
CAMT Camtek Ltd. | $71.36M | $73.47M | $86.04M |
| $1.32M | $1.65M | $3.43M |
CANE vs. CAMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CANE Teucrium Sugar Fund | -1.38% | -14.65% | -7.79% | 30.06% | 3.59% | 36.30% | -3.85% | -0.97% | -27.52% | -24.76% |
CAMT Camtek Ltd. | 24.56% | 31.66% | 18.33% | 215.94% | -52.30% | 110.13% | 102.31% | 63.19% | 20.41% | 77.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between CANE and CAMT is -0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2011 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CANE vs. CAMT — Risk / Return Rank
CANE
CAMT
CANE vs. CAMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) and Camtek Ltd. (CAMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CANE | CAMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.15 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 1.05 | -1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | 2.82 | -3.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CANE vs. CAMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CANE drawdown since its inception was -81.30%, smaller than the maximum CAMT drawdown of -97.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CANE and CAMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CANE | CAMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.30% | -97.71% | +16.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.82% | -38.80% | +18.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.73% | -63.16% | +21.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.73% | -63.16% | +21.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.29% | -63.16% | -4.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.44% | -36.15% | -27.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.56% | -55.55% | -1.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.33% | 14.47% | -1.14% |
Volatility
CANE vs. CAMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) is 5.03%, while Camtek Ltd. (CAMT) has a volatility of 24.11%. This indicates that CANE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CANE | CAMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.03% | 24.11% | -19.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.18% | 56.30% | -40.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.20% | 69.56% | -49.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.92% | 57.22% | -36.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.58% | 52.78% | -31.20% |
Dividends
CANE vs. CAMT - Dividend Comparison
Neither CANE nor CAMT has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAMT Camtek Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.57% | 2.07% | 2.45% |
CANE Teucrium Sugar Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CANE and CAMT have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAMT has higher volatility (24.11%) compared to CANE (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CANE dropped -81.30% vs CAMT's -97.71%.
CAMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CANE and CAMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer