TILL vs. TAGS
TILL (Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF) and TAGS (Teucrium Agricultural Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - TILL is a Commodities fund actively managed by Teucrium, while TAGS is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium TAGS Index. TILL is actively managed, while TAGS is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TILL returned -8.91%/yr vs -10.24%/yr for TAGS. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TILL charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for TAGS.
Performance
TILL vs. TAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TILL achieves a 2.85% return, which is significantly lower than TAGS's 3.23% return.
TILL
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -7.52%
- YTD
- 2.85%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- 1Y
- -3.91%
- 3Y*
- -8.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TAGS
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -6.52%
- YTD
- 3.23%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- 1Y
- -4.35%
- 3Y*
- -10.24%
- 5Y*
- -0.80%
- 10Y*
- -1.88%
TILL vs. TAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF | 2.85% | -5.97% | -13.98% | -5.00% | -11.52% |
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 3.23% | -8.76% | -14.57% | -6.11% | -12.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between TILL and TAGS is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2022 | 0.96 |
The correlation between TILL and TAGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TILL vs. TAGS — Risk / Return Rank
TILL
TAGS
TILL vs. TAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) and Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TILL | TAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.96 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | -0.47 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.80 | -0.86 | +0.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TILL vs. TAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TILL drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, smaller than the maximum TAGS drawdown of -76.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILL and TAGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TILL | TAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.76% | -76.40% | +42.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.60% | -9.30% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.46% | -32.73% | +3.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.98% | -64.67% | +33.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.48% | -57.24% | +35.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.93% | 5.24% | -0.31% |
Volatility
TILL vs. TAGS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) is 2.83%, while Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) has a volatility of 3.29%. This indicates that TILL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TILL | TAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.83% | 3.29% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.35% | 10.32% | +0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.65% | 12.68% | -0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.69% | 16.33% | -1.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.69% | 18.00% | -3.31% |
TILL vs. TAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TILL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than TAGS's 0.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
TILL vs. TAGS - Dividend Comparison
TILL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, while TAGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF | 4.83% | 4.97% | 2.55% | 51.24% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, TILL and TAGS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TAGS has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to TILL (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TILL dropped -33.76% vs TAGS's -76.40%.
On 3-year performance, TILL leads with -8.91% vs -10.24% for TAGS. On fees, TAGS is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, TILL has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TILL has performed better with a -8.91% return vs -10.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TAGS is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for TILL.
TILL has the higher dividend yield at 4.83%, compared with 0.00% for TAGS.
TILL is categorized as Commodities, while TAGS is Agricultural Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for TILL and 0.21% for TAGS.
TILL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.31 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TILL and TAGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer