TER vs. BAP
TER (Teradyne, Inc.) and BAP (Credicorp Ltd.) are both stocks. TER operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology), while BAP operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, TER returned 34.87%/yr vs 12.23%/yr for BAP. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TER vs. BAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TER achieves a 93.73% return, which is significantly higher than BAP's 11.98% return. Over the past 10 years, TER has outperformed BAP with an annualized return of 34.87%, while BAP has yielded a comparatively lower 12.23% annualized return.
TER
- 1D
- 4.68%
- 1M
- 4.19%
- YTD
- 93.73%
- 6M
- 84.73%
- 1Y
- 340.75%
- 3Y*
- 53.39%
- 5Y*
- 25.10%
- 10Y*
- 34.87%
BAP
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- -2.76%
- YTD
- 11.98%
- 6M
- 19.32%
- 1Y
- 47.72%
- 3Y*
- 37.39%
- 5Y*
- 26.07%
- 10Y*
- 12.23%
TER vs. BAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TER Teradyne, Inc. | 93.73% | 54.39% | 16.51% | 24.78% | -46.35% | 36.81% | 76.73% | 118.93% | -24.37% | 66.16% |
BAP Credicorp Ltd. | 11.98% | 65.23% | 31.35% | 16.29% | 14.47% | -24.73% | -17.56% | -0.26% | 7.07% | 37.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between TER and BAP is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 1995 | 0.25 |
Fundamentals
TER:
$59.06B
BAP:
$25.42B
TER:
$5.38
BAP:
$90.36
TER:
69.70
BAP:
3.54
TER:
15.72
BAP:
0.89
TER:
18.79
BAP:
0.66
TER:
$3.79B
BAP:
$28.76B
TER:
$2.23B
BAP:
$22.06B
TER:
$1.11B
BAP:
$11.19B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TER vs. BAP — Risk / Return Rank
TER
BAP
TER vs. BAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teradyne, Inc. (TER) and Credicorp Ltd. (BAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TER | BAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.29 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.85 | 2.57 | +10.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 46.52 | 6.50 | +40.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TER | BAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.19 | 1.53 | +3.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.84 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | 0.40 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.44 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
TER vs. BAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TER drawdown since its inception was -97.30%, which is greater than BAP's maximum drawdown of -75.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TER and BAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TER | BAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.30% | -75.92% | -21.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.73% | -18.65% | -8.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.18% | -26.53% | -31.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.12% | -33.40% | -25.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.12% | -59.09% | -0.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.34% | -14.36% | +4.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.69% | -23.96% | -34.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.37% | 7.36% | +0.01% |
Volatility
TER vs. BAP - Volatility Comparison
Teradyne, Inc. (TER) has a higher volatility of 21.89% compared to Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) at 13.46%. This indicates that TER's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TER | BAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.89% | 13.46% | +8.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.74% | 27.65% | +24.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.25% | 31.35% | +34.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.92% | 31.49% | +18.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.15% | 31.10% | +14.05% |
Dividends
TER vs. BAP - Dividend Comparison
TER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than BAP's 0.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAP Credicorp Ltd. | 0.46% | 3.78% | 6.65% | 4.52% | 2.84% | 0.99% | 5.37% | 3.95% | 0.20% | 4.16% | 1.47% | 2.25% |
TER Teradyne, Inc. | 0.13% | 0.25% | 0.38% | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.24% | 0.33% | 0.53% | 1.15% | 0.67% | 0.94% | 1.16% |
Financials
TER vs. BAP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Teradyne, Inc. and Credicorp Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TER vs. BAP - Profitability Comparison
TER - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported a gross profit of 780.95M and revenue of 1.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.9%.
BAP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credicorp Ltd. reported a gross profit of 6.01B and revenue of 7.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.7%.
TER - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported an operating income of 473.00M and revenue of 1.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.9%.
BAP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credicorp Ltd. reported an operating income of 2.91B and revenue of 7.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.7%.
TER - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported a net income of 398.91M and revenue of 1.28B, resulting in a net margin of 31.1%.
BAP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credicorp Ltd. reported a net income of 2.06B and revenue of 7.74B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TER and BAP have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TER has higher volatility (21.89%) compared to BAP (13.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TER dropped -97.30% vs BAP's -75.92%.
TER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.19 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TER and BAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer