TER vs. PLAB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Teradyne, Inc. (TER) and Photronics, Inc. (PLAB).

Performance

TER vs. PLAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teradyne, Inc. (TER) and Photronics, Inc. (PLAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TER vs. PLAB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TER Teradyne, Inc.	53.23%	54.39%	16.51%	24.78%	-46.35%	36.81%	76.73%	118.93%	-24.37%	66.16%
PLAB Photronics, Inc.	26.28%	35.82%	-24.90%	86.39%	-10.72%	68.91%	-29.19%	62.81%	13.55%	-24.56%

Fundamentals

Market Cap TER : $46.74B PLAB : $2.36B
EPS TER : $3.48 PLAB : $2.29
PE Ratio TER : 85.22 PLAB : 17.61
PS Ratio TER : 14.80 PLAB : 2.79
PB Ratio TER : 16.72 PLAB : 1.43
Total Revenue (TTM) TER : $3.19B PLAB : $862.22M
Gross Profit (TTM) TER : $1.86B PLAB : $303.00M
EBITDA (TTM) TER : $779.72M PLAB : $295.73M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TER achieves a 53.23% return, which is significantly higher than PLAB's 26.28% return. Over the past 10 years, TER has outperformed PLAB with an annualized return of 30.61%, while PLAB has yielded a comparatively lower 14.37% annualized return.

TER

• 1D: 7.28%
• 1M: -7.36%
• YTD: 53.23%
• 6M: 115.64%
• 1Y: 260.24%
• 3Y*: 40.80%
• 5Y*: 18.61%
• 10Y*: 30.61%

PLAB

• 1D: 9.28%
• 1M: 7.96%
• YTD: 26.28%
• 6M: 76.08%
• 1Y: 94.65%
• 3Y*: 34.58%
• 5Y*: 25.33%
• 10Y*: 14.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TER vs. PLAB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TER

TER Risk / Return Rank: 98
TER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
TER Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
TER Omega Ratio Rank: 96
TER Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
TER Martin Ratio Rank: 99

PLAB

PLAB Risk / Return Rank: 85
PLAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
PLAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
PLAB Omega Ratio Rank: 83
PLAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
PLAB Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TER vs. PLAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teradyne, Inc. (TER) and Photronics, Inc. (PLAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TER	PLAB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.21	1.27	+2.94
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.28	2.28	+2.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.30	+0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	12.75	3.89	+8.86
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	38.79	9.03	+29.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TER vs. PLAB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TER Sharpe Ratio is 4.21, which is higher than the PLAB Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TER and PLAB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TER	PLAB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.21	1.27	+2.94
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	0.47	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	0.29	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	0.12	+0.09

Correlation

The correlation between TER and PLAB is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

TER vs. PLAB - Dividend Comparison

TER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, while PLAB has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TER Teradyne, Inc.	0.17%	0.25%	0.38%	0.41%	0.50%	0.24%	0.33%	0.53%	1.15%	0.67%	0.94%	1.16%
PLAB Photronics, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

TER vs. PLAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TER drawdown since its inception was -97.30%, roughly equal to the maximum PLAB drawdown of -99.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TER and PLAB.

Drawdown Indicators

	TER	PLAB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.30%	-99.22%	+1.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.35%	-24.72%	+4.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.12%	-50.62%	-8.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.12%	-50.62%	-8.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.52%	-10.46%	-3.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.93%	-56.61%	-2.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.69%	10.65%	-3.96%

Volatility

TER vs. PLAB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Teradyne, Inc. (TER) is 23.19%, while Photronics, Inc. (PLAB) has a volatility of 24.60%. This indicates that TER experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TER	PLAB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.19%	24.60%	-1.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.67%	59.79%	-14.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.25%	74.70%	-12.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.65%	54.69%	-7.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.72%	49.08%	-5.36%

Financials

TER vs. PLAB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Teradyne, Inc. and Photronics, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TER - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported a gross profit of 622.85M and revenue of 1.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.5%.

PLAB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Photronics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 78.70M and revenue of 225.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.0%.

TER - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported an operating income of 310.18M and revenue of 1.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.6%.

PLAB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Photronics, Inc. reported an operating income of 54.86M and revenue of 225.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.4%.

TER - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported a net income of 257.22M and revenue of 1.08B, resulting in a net margin of 23.7%.

PLAB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Photronics, Inc. reported a net income of 42.94M and revenue of 225.07M, resulting in a net margin of 19.1%.