PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
TER vs. CDNS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


TERCDNS
YTD Return5.29%3.69%
1Y Return26.86%35.87%
3Y Return (Ann)-4.13%28.65%
5Y Return (Ann)19.11%32.89%
10Y Return (Ann)21.52%33.77%
Sharpe Ratio0.661.37
Daily Std Dev34.58%28.26%
Max Drawdown-97.30%-93.13%
Current Drawdown-31.61%-12.51%

Fundamentals


TERCDNS
Market Cap$14.68B$76.40B
EPS$2.73$3.81
PE Ratio35.1573.56
PEG Ratio1.342.84
Revenue (TTM)$2.68B$4.09B
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.87B$3.19B
EBITDA (TTM)$627.57M$1.42B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between TER and CDNS is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

TER vs. CDNS - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, TER achieves a 5.29% return, which is significantly higher than CDNS's 3.69% return. Over the past 10 years, TER has underperformed CDNS with an annualized return of 21.52%, while CDNS has yielded a comparatively higher 33.77% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5,000.00%10,000.00%15,000.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
1,658.42%
15,248.37%
TER
CDNS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Teradyne, Inc.

Cadence Design Systems, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

TER vs. CDNS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teradyne, Inc. (TER) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TER
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TER, currently valued at 0.66, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.66
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TER, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.17
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TER, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.14
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TER, currently valued at 0.45, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.45
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TER, currently valued at 1.74, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.74
CDNS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CDNS, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.37
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CDNS, currently valued at 2.16, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.16
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CDNS, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.25
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CDNS, currently valued at 2.73, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.73
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CDNS, currently valued at 8.65, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.008.65

TER vs. CDNS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TER Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the CDNS Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of TER and CDNS.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
0.66
1.37
TER
CDNS

Dividends

TER vs. CDNS - Dividend Comparison

TER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, while CDNS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TER
Teradyne, Inc.
0.39%0.41%0.50%0.24%0.33%0.53%1.15%0.67%0.94%1.16%0.91%
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TER vs. CDNS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TER drawdown since its inception was -97.30%, roughly equal to the maximum CDNS drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TER and CDNS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-31.61%
-12.51%
TER
CDNS

Volatility

TER vs. CDNS - Volatility Comparison

Teradyne, Inc. (TER) has a higher volatility of 14.11% compared to Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) at 6.71%. This indicates that TER's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
14.11%
6.71%
TER
CDNS

Financials

TER vs. CDNS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Teradyne, Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items