PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
TER vs. AMAT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

TER vs. AMAT

Last updated May 12, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about Teradyne, Inc. (TER) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT).

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TER or AMAT.

Correlation

The correlation between TER and AMAT is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

TER vs. AMAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teradyne, Inc. (TER) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

TER:

28.17%

AMAT:

19.03%

Max Drawdown

TER:

-1.82%

AMAT:

-1.02%

Current Drawdown

TER:

0.00%

AMAT:

-0.25%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TER:

$12.42B

AMAT:

$126.42B

EPS

TER:

$3.53

AMAT:

$7.65

PE Ratio

TER:

21.93

AMAT:

20.34

PEG Ratio

TER:

1.26

AMAT:

1.77

PS Ratio

TER:

4.27

AMAT:

4.57

PB Ratio

TER:

4.31

AMAT:

6.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

TER:

$2.91B

AMAT:

$20.99B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TER:

$1.72B

AMAT:

$10.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

TER:

$715.65M

AMAT:

$6.48B

Returns By Period

TER

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

AMAT

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

TER vs. AMAT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TER
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TER is 1717
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TER is 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TER is 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TER is 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TER is 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TER is 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
AMAT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AMAT is 2525
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AMAT is 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AMAT is 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AMAT is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AMAT is 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AMAT is 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TER vs. AMAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teradyne, Inc. (TER) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

No data
No data
No data
No data
No data

Loading data...

Dividends

TER vs. AMAT - Dividend Comparison

TER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than AMAT's 1.03% yield.

TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TER
Teradyne, Inc.		0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.		1.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TER vs. AMAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TER drawdown since its inception was -1.82%, which is greater than AMAT's maximum drawdown of -1.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TER and AMAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Loading data...

Volatility

TER vs. AMAT - Volatility Comparison

Loading data...

Financials

TER vs. AMAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Teradyne, Inc. and Applied Materials, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20212022202320242025
685.68M
7.17B
(TER) Total Revenue
(AMAT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TER vs. AMAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Teradyne, Inc. and Applied Materials, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual
45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
60.6%
48.8%
(TER) Gross Margin
(AMAT) Gross Margin
TER - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Teradyne, Inc. reported a gross profit of 415.34M and revenue of 685.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.

AMAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.50B and revenue of 7.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.8%.

TER - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Teradyne, Inc. reported an operating income of 120.80M and revenue of 685.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.

AMAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Applied Materials, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.18B and revenue of 7.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.4%.

TER - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Teradyne, Inc. reported a net income of 98.90M and revenue of 685.68M, resulting in a net margin of 14.4%.

AMAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a net income of 1.19B and revenue of 7.17B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.