PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
TER vs. AMAT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between TER and AMAT is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

TER vs. AMAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teradyne, Inc. (TER) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-6.75%
-17.05%
TER
AMAT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TER:

0.36

AMAT:

0.14

Sortino Ratio

TER:

0.77

AMAT:

0.48

Omega Ratio

TER:

1.10

AMAT:

1.06

Calmar Ratio

TER:

0.38

AMAT:

0.16

Martin Ratio

TER:

0.90

AMAT:

0.29

Ulcer Index

TER:

17.96%

AMAT:

19.93%

Daily Std Dev

TER:

45.36%

AMAT:

42.89%

Max Drawdown

TER:

-97.30%

AMAT:

-85.22%

Current Drawdown

TER:

-26.65%

AMAT:

-30.96%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TER:

$19.59B

AMAT:

$141.87B

EPS

TER:

$3.14

AMAT:

$8.61

PE Ratio

TER:

38.30

AMAT:

20.28

PEG Ratio

TER:

1.34

AMAT:

1.87

Total Revenue (TTM)

TER:

$2.06B

AMAT:

$27.18B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TER:

$1.20B

AMAT:

$12.90B

EBITDA (TTM)

TER:

$542.88M

AMAT:

$8.26B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TER achieves a -3.07% return, which is significantly lower than AMAT's 7.78% return. Over the past 10 years, TER has underperformed AMAT with an annualized return of 21.93%, while AMAT has yielded a comparatively higher 24.24% annualized return.


TER

YTD

-3.07%

1M

-3.67%

6M

-6.75%

1Y

17.17%

5Y*

13.62%

10Y*

21.93%

AMAT

YTD

7.78%

1M

7.11%

6M

-17.05%

1Y

6.26%

5Y*

26.05%

10Y*

24.24%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

TER vs. AMAT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TER
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TER is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TER is 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TER is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TER is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TER is 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TER is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

AMAT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AMAT is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AMAT is 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AMAT is 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AMAT is 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AMAT is 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AMAT is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TER vs. AMAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teradyne, Inc. (TER) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TER, currently valued at 0.36, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.000.360.14
The chart of Sortino ratio for TER, currently valued at 0.77, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.770.48
The chart of Omega ratio for TER, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.101.06
The chart of Calmar ratio for TER, currently valued at 0.38, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.380.16
The chart of Martin ratio for TER, currently valued at 0.90, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.000.900.29
TER
AMAT

The current TER Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is higher than the AMAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TER and AMAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.36
0.14
TER
AMAT

Dividends

TER vs. AMAT - Dividend Comparison

TER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than AMAT's 0.87% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TER
Teradyne, Inc.
0.39%0.38%0.41%0.50%0.24%0.33%0.53%1.15%0.67%0.94%1.16%0.91%
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
0.87%0.93%0.75%1.05%0.60%1.01%1.36%2.14%0.78%1.24%2.14%1.61%

Drawdowns

TER vs. AMAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TER drawdown since its inception was -97.30%, which is greater than AMAT's maximum drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TER and AMAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-26.65%
-30.96%
TER
AMAT

Volatility

TER vs. AMAT - Volatility Comparison

Teradyne, Inc. (TER) has a higher volatility of 13.23% compared to Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) at 12.34%. This indicates that TER's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
13.23%
12.34%
TER
AMAT

Financials

TER vs. AMAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Teradyne, Inc. and Applied Materials, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab