TER vs. AMAT
Compare and contrast key facts about Teradyne, Inc. (TER) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TER or AMAT.
Correlation
The correlation between TER and AMAT is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
TER vs. AMAT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
TER:
0.48
AMAT:
0.11
TER:
0.90
AMAT:
0.44
TER:
1.12
AMAT:
1.06
TER:
0.49
AMAT:
0.13
TER:
1.22
AMAT:
0.26
TER:
17.21%
AMAT:
17.73%
TER:
44.34%
AMAT:
42.51%
TER:
-97.30%
AMAT:
-85.22%
TER:
-22.80%
AMAT:
-34.04%
Fundamentals
TER:
$20.85B
AMAT:
$138.60B
TER:
$3.15
AMAT:
$8.61
TER:
40.64
AMAT:
19.78
TER:
1.32
AMAT:
1.68
TER:
$2.74B
AMAT:
$27.18B
TER:
$1.58B
AMAT:
$12.90B
TER:
$711.41M
AMAT:
$8.26B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TER achieves a 18.87% return, which is significantly higher than AMAT's 4.13% return. Over the past 10 years, TER has underperformed AMAT with an annualized return of 21.16%, while AMAT has yielded a comparatively higher 22.46% annualized return.
TER
18.87%
18.85%
-11.54%
19.85%
13.75%
21.16%
AMAT
4.13%
-4.24%
-26.83%
4.15%
23.39%
22.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TER vs. AMAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teradyne, Inc. (TER) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TER vs. AMAT - Dividend Comparison
TER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than AMAT's 0.91% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TER Teradyne, Inc. | 0.37% | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.24% | 0.33% | 0.53% | 1.15% | 0.67% | 0.94% | 1.16% | 0.91% | 0.00% |
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.05% | 0.60% | 1.01% | 1.36% | 2.14% | 0.78% | 1.24% | 2.14% | 1.61% | 2.21% |
Drawdowns
TER vs. AMAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TER drawdown since its inception was -97.30%, which is greater than AMAT's maximum drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TER and AMAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TER vs. AMAT - Volatility Comparison
Teradyne, Inc. (TER) has a higher volatility of 10.07% compared to Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) at 9.59%. This indicates that TER's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
TER vs. AMAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Teradyne, Inc. and Applied Materials, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities