BAP vs. TQQQ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ).

TQQQ is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). It was launched on Feb 9, 2010.

Performance

BAP vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BAP vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BAP Credicorp Ltd.	18.91%	65.23%	31.35%	16.29%	14.47%	-24.73%	-17.56%	-0.26%	7.07%	37.84%
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	-17.87%	34.35%	58.27%	198.04%	-79.09%	82.98%	110.05%	133.84%	-19.79%	118.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAP achieves a 18.91% return, which is significantly higher than TQQQ's -17.87% return. Over the past 10 years, BAP has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 14.68%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 35.31% annualized return.

BAP

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: -3.31%
• YTD: 18.91%
• 6M: 30.15%
• 1Y: 87.06%
• 3Y*: 45.42%
• 5Y*: 25.26%
• 10Y*: 14.68%

TQQQ

• 1D: 3.72%
• 1M: -12.88%
• YTD: -17.87%
• 6M: -17.28%
• 1Y: 48.52%
• 3Y*: 46.87%
• 5Y*: 13.55%
• 10Y*: 35.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BAP vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAP

BAP Risk / Return Rank: 96
BAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
BAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
BAP Omega Ratio Rank: 95
BAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
BAP Martin Ratio Rank: 95

TQQQ

TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 47
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 50
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAP vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BAP	TQQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.28	0.72	+2.55
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.78	1.41	+2.38
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.20	+0.33
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.28	1.41	+4.88
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.83	4.28	+12.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BAP vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAP Sharpe Ratio is 3.28, which is higher than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAP and TQQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BAP	TQQQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.28	0.72	+2.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80	0.20	+0.60
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.54	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.65	-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between BAP and TQQQ is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BAP vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

BAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, more than TQQQ's 0.73% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BAP Credicorp Ltd.	3.18%	3.78%	6.65%	4.52%	2.84%	0.99%	5.37%	3.95%	0.20%	4.16%	1.47%	2.25%
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	0.73%	0.65%	1.27%	1.26%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%

Drawdowns

BAP vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAP drawdown since its inception was -75.92%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAP and TQQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAP	TQQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.92%	-81.66%	+5.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.88%	-36.97%	+22.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.76%	-81.66%	+41.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.09%	-81.66%	+22.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.06%	-28.08%	+19.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.03%	-18.66%	-5.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.55%	12.13%	-6.58%

Volatility

BAP vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) is 11.17%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 19.74%. This indicates that BAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAP	TQQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.17%	19.74%	-8.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.72%	38.50%	-17.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.88%	67.35%	-40.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.60%	66.53%	-34.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.78%	65.83%	-35.05%