PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAP vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BAP vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAP achieves a 39.67% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 57.45% return. Over the past 10 years, BAP has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 14.57%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 45.79% annualized return.


BAP

1D
-1.08%
1M
21.21%
YTD
39.67%
6M
42.65%
1Y
84.07%
3Y*
44.93%
5Y*
33.76%
10Y*
14.57%

TQQQ

1D
6.87%
1M
13.63%
YTD
57.45%
6M
61.40%
1Y
127.19%
3Y*
61.43%
5Y*
25.74%
10Y*
45.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAP vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BAP
Credicorp Ltd.
39.67%65.23%31.35%16.29%14.47%-24.73%-17.56%-0.26%8.91%37.84%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
57.45%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between BAP and TQQQ is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAP vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAP
BAP Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
BAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
BAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAP vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BAPTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.36

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.38

3.46

+1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.89

11.05

+0.84

BAP vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAP Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAP and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BAP vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAP drawdown since its inception was -75.92%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAP and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAPTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.92%

-81.66%

+5.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.71%

-36.97%

+21.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.53%

-58.04%

+31.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.40%

-81.66%

+48.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.09%

-81.66%

+22.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

-4.99%

+3.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.92%

-18.50%

-5.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.09%

11.55%

-4.46%

Volatility

BAP vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) is 15.57%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 25.44%. This indicates that BAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAPTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.57%

25.44%

-9.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.54%

42.61%

-13.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.23%

52.43%

-19.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.70%

67.25%

-35.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.26%

66.33%

-35.07%

Dividends

BAP vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

BAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, more than TQQQ's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAP
Credicorp Ltd.
3.73%3.78%6.65%4.52%2.84%0.99%5.37%3.95%1.94%4.16%1.47%2.25%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.38%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


BAP and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (25.44%) compared to BAP (15.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAP dropped -75.92% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

BAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAP and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer