PortfoliosLab logo
BAP vs. IFS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BAP and IFS is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

BAP vs. IFS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) and Intercorp Financial Services Inc. (IFS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BAP:

1.52

IFS:

2.55

Sortino Ratio

BAP:

2.09

IFS:

3.24

Omega Ratio

BAP:

1.26

IFS:

1.44

Calmar Ratio

BAP:

1.36

IFS:

1.77

Martin Ratio

BAP:

7.36

IFS:

14.60

Ulcer Index

BAP:

4.93%

IFS:

4.15%

Daily Std Dev

BAP:

24.50%

IFS:

24.00%

Max Drawdown

BAP:

-73.44%

IFS:

-55.33%

Current Drawdown

BAP:

0.00%

IFS:

-4.14%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BAP:

$16.55B

IFS:

$4.08B

EPS

BAP:

$19.53

IFS:

$3.10

PE Ratio

BAP:

10.67

IFS:

11.42

PS Ratio

BAP:

0.88

IFS:

0.83

PB Ratio

BAP:

1.72

IFS:

1.40

Total Revenue (TTM)

BAP:

$20.74B

IFS:

$5.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BAP:

$20.74B

IFS:

$6.00B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAP achieves a 20.78% return, which is significantly lower than IFS's 23.68% return.


BAP

YTD

20.78%

1M

10.61%

6M

15.75%

1Y

36.94%

3Y*

16.88%

5Y*

11.66%

10Y*

7.20%

IFS

YTD

23.68%

1M

3.47%

6M

29.41%

1Y

60.70%

3Y*

15.43%

5Y*

12.65%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Credicorp Ltd.

Intercorp Financial Services Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BAP vs. IFS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BAP is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BAP is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BAP is 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BAP is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BAP is 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BAP is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

IFS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IFS is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IFS is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IFS is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IFS is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IFS is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IFS is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BAP vs. IFS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) and Intercorp Financial Services Inc. (IFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BAP Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the IFS Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAP and IFS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

BAP vs. IFS - Dividend Comparison

BAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, more than IFS's 2.84% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BAP
Credicorp Ltd.
6.55%2.10%0.45%0.29%4.10%5.37%3.94%0.20%4.32%1.47%2.25%1.19%
IFS
Intercorp Financial Services Inc.
2.84%3.41%5.38%7.45%5.38%5.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BAP vs. IFS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAP drawdown since its inception was -73.44%, which is greater than IFS's maximum drawdown of -55.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAP and IFS.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

BAP vs. IFS - Volatility Comparison

Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) has a higher volatility of 5.57% compared to Intercorp Financial Services Inc. (IFS) at 5.09%. This indicates that BAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

BAP vs. IFS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Credicorp Ltd. and Intercorp Financial Services Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20212022202320242025
4.93B
1.35B
(BAP) Total Revenue
(IFS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BAP vs. IFS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Credicorp Ltd. and Intercorp Financial Services Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

85.0%90.0%95.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
100.0%
(BAP) Gross Margin
(IFS) Gross Margin
BAP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Credicorp Ltd. reported a gross profit of 4.93B and revenue of 4.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

IFS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Intercorp Financial Services Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.35B and revenue of 1.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

BAP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Credicorp Ltd. reported an operating income of 2.67B and revenue of 4.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 54.2%.

IFS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Intercorp Financial Services Inc. reported an operating income of 743.14M and revenue of 1.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 55.1%.

BAP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Credicorp Ltd. reported a net income of 1.13B and revenue of 4.93B, resulting in a net margin of 22.9%.

IFS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Intercorp Financial Services Inc. reported a net income of 487.55M and revenue of 1.35B, resulting in a net margin of 36.2%.