BAP vs. AAPL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) and Apple Inc (AAPL).

Performance

BAP vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BAP vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BAP Credicorp Ltd.	18.18%	65.23%	31.35%	16.29%	14.47%	-24.73%	-17.56%	-0.26%	7.07%	37.84%
AAPL Apple Inc	-6.56%	9.05%	30.71%	49.01%	-26.40%	34.65%	82.31%	88.96%	-5.39%	48.46%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BAP : $27.05B AAPL : $3.76T
EPS BAP : $86.75 AAPL : $7.89
PE Ratio BAP : 3.91 AAPL : 32.15
PEG Ratio BAP : 0.21 AAPL : 4.23
PS Ratio BAP : 0.97 AAPL : 8.69
PB Ratio BAP : 0.71 AAPL : 42.62
Total Revenue (TTM) BAP : $27.95B AAPL : $435.62B
Gross Profit (TTM) BAP : $21.08B AAPL : $206.16B
EBITDA (TTM) BAP : $10.77B AAPL : $150.07B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAP achieves a 18.18% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's -6.56% return. Over the past 10 years, BAP has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 14.61%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 26.13% annualized return.

BAP

• 1D: 6.18%
• 1M: -2.08%
• YTD: 18.18%
• 6M: 27.38%
• 1Y: 92.29%
• 3Y*: 45.12%
• 5Y*: 25.11%
• 10Y*: 14.61%

AAPL

• 1D: 2.90%
• 1M: -3.93%
• YTD: -6.56%
• 6M: -0.14%
• 1Y: 14.75%
• 3Y*: 16.01%
• 5Y*: 16.20%
• 10Y*: 26.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BAP vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAP

BAP Risk / Return Rank: 96
BAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BAP Omega Ratio Rank: 96
BAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
BAP Martin Ratio Rank: 95

AAPL

AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 59
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 56
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAP vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BAP	AAPL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.45	0.47	+2.98
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.94	0.92	+3.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.13	+0.42
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.07	0.74	+5.33
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.33	2.30	+14.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BAP vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAP Sharpe Ratio is 3.45, which is higher than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAP and AAPL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BAP	AAPL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.45	0.47	+2.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80	0.59	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.91	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.43	+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between BAP and AAPL is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BAP vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

BAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, more than AAPL's 0.41% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BAP Credicorp Ltd.	3.20%	3.78%	6.65%	4.52%	2.84%	0.99%	5.37%	3.95%	0.20%	4.16%	1.47%	2.25%
AAPL Apple Inc	0.41%	0.38%	0.40%	0.49%	0.70%	0.49%	0.61%	1.04%	1.79%	1.45%	1.93%	1.93%

Drawdowns

BAP vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAP drawdown since its inception was -75.92%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAP and AAPL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAP	AAPL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.92%	-81.80%	+5.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.88%	-22.99%	+8.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.76%	-33.36%	-6.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.09%	-38.52%	-20.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.61%	-11.24%	+1.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.03%	-29.71%	+5.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.53%	7.38%	-1.85%

Volatility

BAP vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) has a higher volatility of 12.67% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 5.58%. This indicates that BAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAP	AAPL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.67%	5.58%	+7.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.72%	15.09%	+5.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.91%	31.66%	-4.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.60%	27.46%	+4.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.79%	28.94%	+1.85%

Financials

BAP vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Credicorp Ltd. and Apple Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BAP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Credicorp Ltd. reported a gross profit of 6.39B and revenue of 8.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.9%.

AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 69.23B and revenue of 143.76B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.2%.

BAP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Credicorp Ltd. reported an operating income of 2.34B and revenue of 8.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.2%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 50.85B and revenue of 143.76B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.4%.

BAP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Credicorp Ltd. reported a net income of 1.58B and revenue of 8.31B, resulting in a net margin of 19.0%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 42.10B and revenue of 143.76B, resulting in a net margin of 29.3%.