BAP vs. GS
Compare and contrast key facts about Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BAP or GS.
Correlation
The correlation between BAP and GS is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BAP vs. GS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BAP:
1.02
GS:
2.09
BAP:
1.55
GS:
3.04
BAP:
1.18
GS:
1.40
BAP:
0.72
GS:
5.45
BAP:
4.83
GS:
19.41
BAP:
4.76%
GS:
2.76%
BAP:
22.63%
GS:
25.66%
BAP:
-73.50%
GS:
-78.84%
BAP:
-12.96%
GS:
-6.52%
Fundamentals
BAP:
$14.66B
GS:
$180.40B
BAP:
$17.25
GS:
$34.12
BAP:
10.70
GS:
16.84
BAP:
1.16
GS:
3.95
BAP:
$19.94B
GS:
$50.96B
BAP:
$19.94B
GS:
$33.41B
BAP:
$4.06B
GS:
$18.07B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAP achieves a 24.15% return, which is significantly lower than GS's 50.30% return. Over the past 10 years, BAP has underperformed GS with an annualized return of 3.91%, while GS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.47% annualized return.
BAP
24.15%
-5.55%
16.86%
21.98%
-0.37%
3.91%
GS
50.30%
-2.24%
27.12%
52.35%
22.86%
13.47%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BAP vs. GS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BAP vs. GS - Dividend Comparison
BAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, more than GS's 2.03% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAP Credicorp Ltd. | 2.11% | 0.45% | 0.29% | 4.10% | 5.37% | 3.94% | 0.20% | 4.32% | 1.47% | 2.25% | 1.19% | 1.96% |
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 2.03% | 2.72% | 2.62% | 1.70% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 1.89% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.41% | 1.16% | 1.16% |
Drawdowns
BAP vs. GS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAP drawdown since its inception was -73.50%, smaller than the maximum GS drawdown of -78.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAP and GS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BAP vs. GS - Volatility Comparison
Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) has a higher volatility of 7.94% compared to The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) at 6.67%. This indicates that BAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BAP vs. GS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Credicorp Ltd. and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities