BAP vs. GS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS).

Performance

BAP vs. GS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BAP vs. GS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BAP Credicorp Ltd.	18.18%	65.23%	31.35%	16.29%	14.47%	-24.73%	-17.56%	-0.26%	7.07%	37.84%
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.	-3.25%	56.64%	52.03%	15.91%	-7.87%	47.61%	17.45%	40.48%	-33.53%	7.73%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BAP : $27.05B GS : $268.69B
EPS BAP : $86.75 GS : $54.19
PE Ratio BAP : 3.91 GS : 15.61
PEG Ratio BAP : 0.21 GS : 2.02
PS Ratio BAP : 0.97 GS : 2.14
PB Ratio BAP : 0.71 GS : 2.15
Total Revenue (TTM) BAP : $27.95B GS : $125.10B
Gross Profit (TTM) BAP : $21.08B GS : $57.17B
EBITDA (TTM) BAP : $10.77B GS : $21.81B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAP achieves a 18.18% return, which is significantly higher than GS's -3.25% return. Over the past 10 years, BAP has underperformed GS with an annualized return of 14.61%, while GS has yielded a comparatively higher 20.59% annualized return.

BAP

• 1D: 6.18%
• 1M: -2.08%
• YTD: 18.18%
• 6M: 27.38%
• 1Y: 92.29%
• 3Y*: 45.12%
• 5Y*: 25.11%
• 10Y*: 14.61%

GS

• 1D: 4.75%
• 1M: -1.06%
• YTD: -3.25%
• 6M: 7.32%
• 1Y: 58.07%
• 3Y*: 40.67%
• 5Y*: 23.83%
• 10Y*: 20.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BAP vs. GS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAP

BAP Risk / Return Rank: 96
BAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BAP Omega Ratio Rank: 96
BAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
BAP Martin Ratio Rank: 95

GS

GS Risk / Return Rank: 87
GS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
GS Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
GS Omega Ratio Rank: 86
GS Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
GS Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAP vs. GS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BAP	GS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.45	1.82	+1.64
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.94	2.35	+1.60
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.33	+0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.07	3.04	+3.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.33	9.70	+6.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BAP vs. GS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAP Sharpe Ratio is 3.45, which is higher than the GS Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAP and GS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BAP	GS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.45	1.82	+1.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80	0.87	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.70	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.31	+0.13

Correlation

The correlation between BAP and GS is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BAP vs. GS - Dividend Comparison

BAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, more than GS's 1.83% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BAP Credicorp Ltd.	3.20%	3.78%	6.65%	4.52%	2.84%	0.99%	5.37%	3.95%	0.20%	4.16%	1.47%	2.25%
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.	1.83%	1.59%	2.01%	2.72%	2.62%	1.70%	1.90%	1.80%	1.89%	1.14%	1.09%	1.41%

Drawdowns

BAP vs. GS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAP drawdown since its inception was -75.92%, roughly equal to the maximum GS drawdown of -78.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAP and GS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAP	GS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.92%	-78.84%	+2.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.88%	-19.42%	+4.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.76%	-32.84%	-6.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.09%	-48.75%	-10.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.61%	-12.85%	+3.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.03%	-22.75%	-1.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.53%	6.08%	-0.55%

Volatility

BAP vs. GS - Volatility Comparison

Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) has a higher volatility of 12.67% compared to The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) at 9.44%. This indicates that BAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAP	GS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.67%	9.44%	+3.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.72%	21.70%	-0.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.91%	32.11%	-5.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.60%	27.68%	+3.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.79%	29.71%	+1.08%

Financials

BAP vs. GS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Credicorp Ltd. and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BAP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Credicorp Ltd. reported a gross profit of 6.39B and revenue of 8.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.9%.

GS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 13.35B and revenue of 30.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.3%.

BAP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Credicorp Ltd. reported an operating income of 2.34B and revenue of 8.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.2%.

GS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.63B and revenue of 30.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.1%.

BAP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Credicorp Ltd. reported a net income of 1.58B and revenue of 8.31B, resulting in a net margin of 19.0%.

GS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported a net income of 4.62B and revenue of 30.13B, resulting in a net margin of 15.3%.