SKYU vs. NOBL
SKYU (ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SKYU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the ISE Cloud Computing Index (200%), while NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SKYU returned -6.58%/yr vs 6.42%/yr for NOBL. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SKYU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.
Performance
SKYU vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SKYU achieves a -12.74% return, which is significantly lower than NOBL's 8.38% return.
SKYU
- 1D
- -3.96%
- 1M
- -12.28%
- YTD
- -12.74%
- 6M
- -15.69%
- 1Y
- 0.09%
- 3Y*
- 26.71%
- 5Y*
- -6.58%
- 10Y*
- —
NOBL
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 4.19%
- YTD
- 8.38%
- 6M
- 7.32%
- 1Y
- 15.05%
- 3Y*
- 8.82%
- 5Y*
- 6.42%
- 10Y*
- 10.32%
SKYU vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKYU ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF | -12.74% | 2.76% | 65.79% | 105.76% | -75.95% | 6.83% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 8.38% | 6.84% | 6.72% | 8.09% | -6.52% | 23.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between SKYU and NOBL is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2021 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SKYU and NOBL has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SKYU vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SKYU
NOBL
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SKYU
NOBL
Communication Services
SKYU
NOBL
-
Consumer Cyclical
SKYU
NOBL
Industrials
SKYU
NOBL
Healthcare
SKYU
NOBL
Basic Materials
SKYU
-
NOBL
Consumer Defensive
SKYU
-
NOBL
Energy
SKYU
-
NOBL
Financial Services
SKYU
-
NOBL
Real Estate
SKYU
-
NOBL
Utilities
SKYU
-
NOBL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SKYU vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank
SKYU
NOBL
SKYU vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF (SKYU) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SKYU | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.22 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.00 | 1.66 | -1.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.00 | 4.21 | -4.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SKYU vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SKYU drawdown since its inception was -83.01%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKYU and NOBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SKYU | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.01% | -35.43% | -47.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.23% | -9.11% | -41.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.71% | -15.36% | -40.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.01% | -17.92% | -65.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.81% | -1.57% | -42.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.00% | -3.48% | -45.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.70% | 3.59% | +21.11% |
Volatility
SKYU vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF (SKYU) has a higher volatility of 26.41% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 3.45%. This indicates that SKYU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SKYU | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.41% | 3.45% | +22.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.23% | 8.29% | +39.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.35% | 11.52% | +45.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.19% | 14.39% | +47.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.12% | 16.60% | +44.52% |
SKYU vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SKYU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SKYU vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
SKYU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than NOBL's 2.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.09% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
SKYU ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF | 0.94% | 0.56% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SKYU and NOBL have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SKYU has higher volatility (26.41%) compared to NOBL (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKYU dropped -83.01% vs NOBL's -35.43%.
On 5-year performance, NOBL leads with 6.42% vs -6.58% for SKYU. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 3.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NOBL has performed better with a 6.42% return vs -6.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SKYU.
NOBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.09%, compared with 0.94% for SKYU.
SKYU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NOBL is Dividend. SKYU tracks ISE Cloud Computing Index (200%), while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SKYU and 0.35% for NOBL.
NOBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SKYU and NOBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer