PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SKYU vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SKYU vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF (SKYU) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SKYU achieves a 29.06% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 65.71% return.


SKYU

1D
-2.86%
1M
48.96%
YTD
29.06%
6M
26.06%
1Y
54.01%
3Y*
41.36%
5Y*
4.20%
10Y*

TQQQ

1D
1.37%
1M
33.57%
YTD
65.71%
6M
58.23%
1Y
145.30%
3Y*
69.92%
5Y*
29.86%
10Y*
45.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SKYU vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SKYU
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF
29.06%2.76%65.79%105.76%-75.95%7.15%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
65.71%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%63.97%

Correlation

The correlation between SKYU and TQQQ is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2021

0.79

The correlation between SKYU and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SKYU vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SKYU
TQQQ

Technology

51.5%
53.8%

Communication Services

4.7%
15.8%

Industrials

2.5%
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

2.4%
12.3%

Healthcare

0.3%
4.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Technology

SKYU
51.5%
TQQQ
53.8%

Communication Services

SKYU
4.7%
TQQQ
15.8%

Industrials

SKYU
2.5%
TQQQ
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SKYU
2.4%
TQQQ
12.3%

Healthcare

SKYU
0.3%
TQQQ
4.2%

Basic Materials

SKYU

-

TQQQ
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

SKYU

-

TQQQ
7.7%

Energy

SKYU

-

TQQQ
0.6%

Financial Services

SKYU

-

TQQQ
0.2%

Real Estate

SKYU

-

TQQQ
0.1%

Utilities

SKYU

-

TQQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SKYU vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SKYU
SKYU Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SKYU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SKYU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
SKYU Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
SKYU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
SKYU Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SKYU vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF (SKYU) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SKYUTQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.98

3.07

-2.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.61

3.19

-1.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.42

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

4.08

-2.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.34

13.38

-11.04

SKYU vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SKYU Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SKYU and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SKYUTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

3.07

-2.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.45

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.74

-0.69

Drawdowns

SKYU vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SKYU drawdown since its inception was -83.01%, roughly equal to the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKYU and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SKYUTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.01%

-81.66%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.23%

-36.97%

-13.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.71%

-58.04%

+2.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.01%

-81.66%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.89%

0.00%

-16.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.20%

-18.53%

-30.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.87%

11.28%

+12.59%

Volatility

SKYU vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF (SKYU) has a higher volatility of 21.37% compared to ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) at 13.26%. This indicates that SKYU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SKYUTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.37%

13.26%

+8.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.22%

36.05%

+10.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.51%

47.63%

+7.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.82%

66.55%

-4.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.09%

65.98%

-4.89%

SKYU vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SKYU and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

SKYU vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

SKYU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SKYU
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF
0.54%0.56%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.36%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


SKYU and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SKYU has higher volatility (21.37%) compared to TQQQ (13.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKYU dropped -83.01% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 5-year performance, TQQQ leads with 29.86% vs 4.20% for SKYU. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, TQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 29.86% return vs 4.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SKYU and TQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

SKYU has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.36% for TQQQ.

SKYU tracks ISE Cloud Computing Index (200%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%).

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SKYU and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer