PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SKYU vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SKYU vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF (SKYU) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SKYU achieves a 10.45% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 12.26% return.


SKYU

1D
4.12%
1M
11.55%
6M
33.19%
YTD
10.45%
1Y
27.20%
3Y*
28.28%
5Y*
-2.25%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-0.09%

QQQ

1D
0.65%
1M
-3.45%
6M
10.89%
YTD
12.26%
1Y
24.81%
3Y*
22.29%
5Y*
14.23%
10Y*
20.44%
ALL TIME*
10.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$30.32B$28.40B$31.45B
$41.84K$68.11K$109.30K

SKYU vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SKYU
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF
10.45%2.76%65.79%105.76%-75.95%6.83%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
12.26%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%23.47%

Correlation

The correlation between SKYU and QQQ is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2021

0.78

The correlation between SKYU and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SKYU vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SKYU
QQQ

Technology

87.7%
60.9%

Communication Services

8.2%
13.1%

Consumer Cyclical

3.5%
10.7%

Industrials

2.4%
2.7%

Healthcare

0.7%
3.6%

Basic Materials

-

1.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.3%

Energy

-

0.5%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.1%

Technology

SKYU
87.7%
QQQ
60.9%

Communication Services

SKYU
8.2%
QQQ
13.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SKYU
3.5%
QQQ
10.7%

Industrials

SKYU
2.4%
QQQ
2.7%

Healthcare

SKYU
0.7%
QQQ
3.6%

Basic Materials

SKYU

-

QQQ
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

SKYU

-

QQQ
6.3%

Energy

SKYU

-

QQQ
0.5%

Financial Services

SKYU

-

QQQ
0.2%

Real Estate

SKYU

-

QQQ
0.1%

Utilities

SKYU

-

QQQ
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SKYU vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SKYU
SKYU Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
SKYU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SKYU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
SKYU Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
SKYU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
SKYU Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SKYU vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF (SKYU) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SKYUQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.21

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

1.88

-1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.71

6.00

-5.29

SKYU vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SKYU Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SKYU and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SKYU vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SKYU drawdown since its inception was -83.01%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKYU and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SKYUQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.01%

-82.97%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.23%

-11.96%

-38.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.71%

-22.77%

-32.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.01%

-35.12%

-47.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.87%

-7.69%

-21.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.74%

-32.62%

-16.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.76%

3.74%

+22.02%

Volatility

SKYU vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF (SKYU) has a higher volatility of 13.83% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 6.87%. This indicates that SKYU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SKYUQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.83%

6.87%

+6.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.13%

16.08%

+32.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.82%

19.38%

+39.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.44%

22.90%

+39.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.93%

22.50%

+38.43%

SKYU vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SKYU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

SKYU vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

SKYU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than QQQ's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.44%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
SKYU
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF
0.74%0.56%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SKYU and QQQ have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SKYU has higher volatility (13.83%) compared to QQQ (6.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKYU dropped -83.01% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 14.23% vs -2.25% for SKYU. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 14.23% return vs -2.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SKYU.

SKYU has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.44% for QQQ.

SKYU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. SKYU tracks ISE Cloud Computing Index (200%), while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SKYU and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SKYU and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer