SKYU vs. QQQ
SKYU (ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SKYU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the ISE Cloud Computing Index (200%), while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SKYU returned 4.20%/yr vs 18.43%/yr for QQQ. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SKYU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
SKYU vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SKYU achieves a 29.06% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 21.62% return.
SKYU
- 1D
- -2.86%
- 1M
- 48.96%
- YTD
- 29.06%
- 6M
- 26.06%
- 1Y
- 54.01%
- 3Y*
- 41.36%
- 5Y*
- 4.20%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 10.68%
- YTD
- 21.62%
- 6M
- 20.27%
- 1Y
- 43.30%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.43%
- 10Y*
- 21.97%
SKYU vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKYU ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF | 29.06% | 2.76% | 65.79% | 105.76% | -75.95% | 7.15% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.62% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 22.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between SKYU and QQQ is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2021 | 0.79 |
The correlation between SKYU and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SKYU vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SKYU
QQQ
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SKYU
QQQ
Communication Services
SKYU
QQQ
Industrials
SKYU
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
SKYU
QQQ
Healthcare
SKYU
QQQ
Basic Materials
SKYU
-
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
SKYU
-
QQQ
Energy
SKYU
-
QQQ
Financial Services
SKYU
-
QQQ
Real Estate
SKYU
-
QQQ
Utilities
SKYU
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SKYU vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
SKYU
QQQ
SKYU vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF (SKYU) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SKYU | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.98 | 2.73 | -1.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.61 | 3.55 | -1.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.47 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 3.71 | -2.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.34 | 14.30 | -11.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SKYU | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 2.73 | -1.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.83 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.41 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
SKYU vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SKYU drawdown since its inception was -83.01%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKYU and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SKYU | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.01% | -82.97% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.23% | -11.96% | -38.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.71% | -22.77% | -32.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.01% | -35.12% | -47.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.89% | 0.00% | -16.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.20% | -32.79% | -16.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.87% | 3.11% | +20.76% |
Volatility
SKYU vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF (SKYU) has a higher volatility of 21.37% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.48%. This indicates that SKYU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SKYU | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.37% | 4.48% | +16.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.22% | 12.11% | +34.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.51% | 15.95% | +39.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.82% | 22.39% | +39.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.09% | 22.30% | +38.79% |
SKYU vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SKYU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
SKYU vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
SKYU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
SKYU ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF | 0.54% | 0.56% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SKYU and QQQ have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SKYU has higher volatility (21.37%) compared to QQQ (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKYU dropped -83.01% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 18.43% vs 4.20% for SKYU. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 18.43% return vs 4.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SKYU.
SKYU has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.
SKYU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. SKYU tracks ISE Cloud Computing Index (200%), while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SKYU and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SKYU and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer