SKYU vs. CLOU
SKYU (ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF) and CLOU (Global X Cloud Computing ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SKYU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the ISE Cloud Computing Index (200%), while CLOU is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SKYU returned 4.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for CLOU. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SKYU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for CLOU.
Performance
SKYU vs. CLOU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SKYU achieves a 29.06% return, which is significantly higher than CLOU's 13.35% return.
SKYU
- 1D
- -2.86%
- 1M
- 48.96%
- YTD
- 29.06%
- 6M
- 26.06%
- 1Y
- 54.01%
- 3Y*
- 41.36%
- 5Y*
- 4.20%
- 10Y*
- —
CLOU
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 21.81%
- YTD
- 13.35%
- 6M
- 13.05%
- 1Y
- 11.58%
- 3Y*
- 10.56%
- 5Y*
- 0.30%
- 10Y*
- —
SKYU vs. CLOU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKYU ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF | 29.06% | 2.76% | 65.79% | 105.76% | -75.95% | 7.15% |
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF | 13.35% | -5.59% | 5.74% | 41.36% | -39.56% | -5.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between SKYU and CLOU is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2021 | 0.89 |
The correlation between SKYU and CLOU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
SKYU vs. CLOU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SKYU
CLOU
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
SKYU
CLOU
Communication Services
SKYU
CLOU
Industrials
SKYU
CLOU
-
Consumer Cyclical
SKYU
CLOU
Healthcare
SKYU
CLOU
Basic Materials
SKYU
-
CLOU
-
Consumer Defensive
SKYU
-
CLOU
-
Energy
SKYU
-
CLOU
-
Financial Services
SKYU
-
CLOU
-
Real Estate
SKYU
-
CLOU
Utilities
SKYU
-
CLOU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SKYU vs. CLOU — Risk / Return Rank
SKYU
CLOU
SKYU vs. CLOU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF (SKYU) and Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SKYU | CLOU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.98 | 0.40 | +0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.61 | 0.75 | +0.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.09 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 0.44 | +0.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.34 | 1.09 | +1.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SKYU | CLOU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 0.40 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.01 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.26 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
SKYU vs. CLOU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SKYU drawdown since its inception was -83.01%, which is greater than CLOU's maximum drawdown of -53.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKYU and CLOU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SKYU | CLOU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.01% | -53.74% | -29.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.23% | -27.24% | -22.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.71% | -33.18% | -22.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.01% | -53.74% | -29.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.89% | -18.82% | +1.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.20% | -24.42% | -24.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.87% | 11.01% | +12.86% |
Volatility
SKYU vs. CLOU - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF (SKYU) has a higher volatility of 21.37% compared to Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) at 13.10%. This indicates that SKYU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SKYU | CLOU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.37% | 13.10% | +8.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.22% | 24.52% | +21.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.51% | 29.26% | +26.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.82% | 30.53% | +31.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.09% | 30.77% | +30.32% |
SKYU vs. CLOU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SKYU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CLOU's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
SKYU vs. CLOU - Dividend Comparison
SKYU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, while CLOU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.05% |
SKYU ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF | 0.54% | 0.56% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SKYU and CLOU have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SKYU has higher volatility (21.37%) compared to CLOU (13.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKYU dropped -83.01% vs CLOU's -53.74%.
On 5-year performance, SKYU leads with 4.20% vs 0.30% for CLOU. On fees, CLOU is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, CLOU has been the lower-risk option at 13.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SKYU has performed better with a 4.20% return vs 0.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CLOU is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SKYU.
SKYU has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.00% for CLOU.
SKYU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CLOU is Technology Equities. SKYU tracks ISE Cloud Computing Index (200%), while CLOU tracks Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SKYU and 0.68% for CLOU.
SKYU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SKYU and CLOU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer