PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDOG vs. NOBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDOG vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDOG achieves a 17.13% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 7.43% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SDOG having a 9.99% annualized return and NOBL not far behind at 9.94%.


SDOG

1D
1.26%
1M
5.43%
YTD
17.13%
6M
16.28%
1Y
27.16%
3Y*
16.38%
5Y*
9.08%
10Y*
9.99%

NOBL

1D
0.54%
1M
4.72%
YTD
7.43%
6M
6.43%
1Y
13.97%
3Y*
8.55%
5Y*
5.94%
10Y*
9.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDOG vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDOG
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
17.13%11.12%14.70%4.19%-0.20%24.59%-0.35%24.02%-11.43%12.65%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
7.43%6.84%6.72%8.09%-6.52%25.46%8.35%27.39%-3.26%21.02%

Correlation

The correlation between SDOG and NOBL is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013

0.87

The correlation between SDOG and NOBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

SDOG vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SDOG
NOBL

Consumer Cyclical

16.3%
5.3%

Technology

16.2%
4.6%

Financial Services

10.6%
12.8%

Healthcare

9.8%
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

9.5%
23.6%

Utilities

9.2%
5.7%

Energy

9.1%
2.9%

Communication Services

8.4%

-

Industrials

7.5%
20.2%

Basic Materials

3.5%
10.2%

Real Estate

-

4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SDOG
16.3%
NOBL
5.3%

Technology

SDOG
16.2%
NOBL
4.6%

Financial Services

SDOG
10.6%
NOBL
12.8%

Healthcare

SDOG
9.8%
NOBL
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

SDOG
9.5%
NOBL
23.6%

Utilities

SDOG
9.2%
NOBL
5.7%

Energy

SDOG
9.1%
NOBL
2.9%

Communication Services

SDOG
8.4%
NOBL

-

Industrials

SDOG
7.5%
NOBL
20.2%

Basic Materials

SDOG
3.5%
NOBL
10.2%

Real Estate

SDOG

-

NOBL
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDOG vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDOG
SDOG Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDOG vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SDOGNOBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.19

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.25

1.38

+2.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.63

3.53

+10.10

SDOG vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDOG Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDOG and NOBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SDOG vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDOG drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDOG and NOBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDOGNOBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.56%

-35.43%

-8.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.24%

-9.11%

+2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.00%

-15.36%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.84%

-17.92%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.56%

-35.43%

-8.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.43%

+2.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.91%

-3.48%

-1.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

3.56%

-1.62%

Volatility

SDOG vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) has a higher volatility of 3.34% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 2.95%. This indicates that SDOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDOGNOBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.34%

2.95%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.02%

8.11%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.52%

11.52%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.44%

14.41%

+1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.06%

16.61%

+2.45%

SDOG vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDOG has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDOG vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

SDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than NOBL's 2.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.04%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%
SDOG
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
3.26%3.68%3.86%4.29%3.87%3.62%3.63%3.37%4.03%3.27%3.32%3.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDOG and NOBL have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SDOG has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to NOBL (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDOG dropped -43.56% vs NOBL's -35.43%.

On 10-year performance, SDOG leads with 9.99% vs 9.94% for NOBL. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SDOG has performed better with a 9.99% return vs 9.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for SDOG.

SDOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 2.04% for NOBL.

SDOG is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while NOBL is Dividend. SDOG tracks S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for SDOG and 0.35% for NOBL.

SDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDOG and NOBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer