SDOG vs. SDY
SDOG (ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF) and SDY (SPDR S&P Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SDOG is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while SDY is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SDOG returned 9.69%/yr vs 9.31%/yr for SDY. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SDOG charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SDY.
Performance
SDOG vs. SDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDOG achieves a 15.26% return, which is significantly higher than SDY's 7.65% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SDOG having a 9.69% annualized return and SDY not far behind at 9.31%.
SDOG
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- YTD
- 15.26%
- 6M
- 17.58%
- 1Y
- 26.52%
- 3Y*
- 17.01%
- 5Y*
- 8.74%
- 10Y*
- 9.69%
SDY
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- 7.65%
- 6M
- 8.41%
- 1Y
- 13.50%
- 3Y*
- 9.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.08%
- 10Y*
- 9.31%
SDOG vs. SDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 15.26% | 11.12% | 14.70% | 4.19% | -0.20% | 24.59% | -0.35% | 24.02% | -11.43% | 12.65% |
SDY SPDR S&P Dividend ETF | 7.65% | 8.18% | 8.45% | 2.61% | -0.54% | 25.32% | 1.71% | 23.29% | -2.74% | 15.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDOG and SDY is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2012 | 0.91 |
The correlation between SDOG and SDY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
SDOG vs. SDY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SDOG
SDY
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
SDOG
SDY
Technology
SDOG
SDY
Financial Services
SDOG
SDY
Energy
SDOG
SDY
Consumer Defensive
SDOG
SDY
Healthcare
SDOG
SDY
Utilities
SDOG
SDY
Communication Services
SDOG
SDY
Industrials
SDOG
SDY
Basic Materials
SDOG
SDY
Real Estate
SDOG
-
SDY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDOG vs. SDY — Risk / Return Rank
SDOG
SDY
SDOG vs. SDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) and SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDOG | SDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.34 | 1.31 | +1.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.50 | 2.01 | +1.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.23 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.28 | 1.76 | +2.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.78 | 4.87 | +8.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDOG | SDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 1.31 | +1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.44 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.55 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.47 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
SDOG vs. SDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDOG drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, smaller than the maximum SDY drawdown of -54.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDOG and SDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDOG | SDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.56% | -54.75% | +11.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.24% | -7.67% | +1.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.00% | -14.39% | -1.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.84% | -15.21% | -4.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.56% | -36.70% | -6.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.93% | +3.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.92% | -6.21% | +1.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 2.78% | -0.84% |
Volatility
SDOG vs. SDY - Volatility Comparison
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) has a higher volatility of 3.00% compared to SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY) at 2.73%. This indicates that SDOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDOG | SDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 2.73% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.89% | 7.46% | +0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.37% | 10.33% | +1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 14.03% | +1.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.06% | 17.09% | +1.97% |
SDOG vs. SDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDOG has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than SDY's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDOG vs. SDY - Dividend Comparison
SDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, more than SDY's 2.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 3.32% | 3.68% | 3.86% | 4.29% | 3.87% | 3.62% | 3.63% | 3.37% | 4.03% | 3.27% | 3.32% | 3.61% |
SDY SPDR S&P Dividend ETF | 2.48% | 2.61% | 2.56% | 2.64% | 2.55% | 2.63% | 2.85% | 2.45% | 2.73% | 4.69% | 3.30% | 6.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDOG and SDY have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SDOG has higher volatility (3.00%) compared to SDY (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDOG dropped -43.56% vs SDY's -54.75%.
On 10-year performance, SDOG leads with 9.69% vs 9.31% for SDY. On fees, SDY is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SDY has been the lower-risk option at 2.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SDOG has performed better with a 9.69% return vs 9.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SDY is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for SDOG.
SDOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 2.48% for SDY.
SDOG is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SDY is Mid Cap Value Equities. SDOG tracks S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while SDY tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for SDOG and 0.35% for SDY.
SDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDOG and SDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer