PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDOG vs. SDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDOG vs. SDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) and SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDOG achieves a 15.26% return, which is significantly higher than SDY's 7.65% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SDOG having a 9.69% annualized return and SDY not far behind at 9.31%.


SDOG

1D
1.19%
1M
3.62%
YTD
15.26%
6M
17.58%
1Y
26.52%
3Y*
17.01%
5Y*
8.74%
10Y*
9.69%

SDY

1D
0.66%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
7.65%
6M
8.41%
1Y
13.50%
3Y*
9.88%
5Y*
6.08%
10Y*
9.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDOG vs. SDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDOG
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
15.26%11.12%14.70%4.19%-0.20%24.59%-0.35%24.02%-11.43%12.65%
SDY
SPDR S&P Dividend ETF
7.65%8.18%8.45%2.61%-0.54%25.32%1.71%23.29%-2.74%15.82%

Correlation

The correlation between SDOG and SDY is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2012

0.91

The correlation between SDOG and SDY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

SDOG vs. SDY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SDOG
SDY

Consumer Cyclical

15.0%
5.2%

Technology

14.1%
8.7%

Financial Services

11.0%
11.5%

Energy

9.9%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

9.8%
17.1%

Healthcare

9.7%
6.2%

Utilities

9.4%
14.8%

Communication Services

9.0%
3.5%

Industrials

8.0%
17.5%

Basic Materials

4.1%
6.4%

Real Estate

-

4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SDOG
15.0%
SDY
5.2%

Technology

SDOG
14.1%
SDY
8.7%

Financial Services

SDOG
11.0%
SDY
11.5%

Energy

SDOG
9.9%
SDY
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

SDOG
9.8%
SDY
17.1%

Healthcare

SDOG
9.7%
SDY
6.2%

Utilities

SDOG
9.4%
SDY
14.8%

Communication Services

SDOG
9.0%
SDY
3.5%

Industrials

SDOG
8.0%
SDY
17.5%

Basic Materials

SDOG
4.1%
SDY
6.4%

Real Estate

SDOG

-

SDY
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDOG vs. SDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDOG
SDOG Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

SDY
SDY Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
SDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDY Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
SDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDY Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDOG vs. SDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) and SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDOGSDYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.34

1.31

+1.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.50

2.01

+1.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.23

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.28

1.76

+2.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.78

4.87

+8.91

SDOG vs. SDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDOG Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the SDY Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDOG and SDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDOGSDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

1.31

+1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.44

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.55

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.47

+0.19

Drawdowns

SDOG vs. SDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDOG drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, smaller than the maximum SDY drawdown of -54.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDOG and SDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDOGSDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.56%

-54.75%

+11.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.24%

-7.67%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.00%

-14.39%

-1.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.84%

-15.21%

-4.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.56%

-36.70%

-6.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.93%

+3.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-6.21%

+1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

2.78%

-0.84%

Volatility

SDOG vs. SDY - Volatility Comparison

ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) has a higher volatility of 3.00% compared to SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY) at 2.73%. This indicates that SDOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDOGSDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

2.73%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.89%

7.46%

+0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.37%

10.33%

+1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.42%

14.03%

+1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.06%

17.09%

+1.97%

SDOG vs. SDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDOG has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than SDY's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDOG vs. SDY - Dividend Comparison

SDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, more than SDY's 2.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SDOG
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
3.32%3.68%3.86%4.29%3.87%3.62%3.63%3.37%4.03%3.27%3.32%3.61%
SDY
SPDR S&P Dividend ETF
2.48%2.61%2.56%2.64%2.55%2.63%2.85%2.45%2.73%4.69%3.30%6.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDOG and SDY have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SDOG has higher volatility (3.00%) compared to SDY (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDOG dropped -43.56% vs SDY's -54.75%.

On 10-year performance, SDOG leads with 9.69% vs 9.31% for SDY. On fees, SDY is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SDY has been the lower-risk option at 2.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SDOG has performed better with a 9.69% return vs 9.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SDY is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for SDOG.

SDOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 2.48% for SDY.

SDOG is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SDY is Mid Cap Value Equities. SDOG tracks S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while SDY tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for SDOG and 0.35% for SDY.

SDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDOG and SDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer