SDOG vs. VIG
SDOG (ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF) and VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SDOG is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while VIG is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SDOG returned 9.96%/yr vs 13.34%/yr for VIG. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SDOG charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VIG.
Performance
SDOG vs. VIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDOG achieves a 14.96% return, which is significantly higher than VIG's 6.98% return. Over the past 10 years, SDOG has underperformed VIG with an annualized return of 9.96%, while VIG has yielded a comparatively higher 13.34% annualized return.
SDOG
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- YTD
- 14.96%
- 6M
- 14.84%
- 1Y
- 24.50%
- 3Y*
- 16.57%
- 5Y*
- 9.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.96%
VIG
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 6.98%
- 6M
- 6.28%
- 1Y
- 18.42%
- 3Y*
- 15.85%
- 5Y*
- 10.82%
- 10Y*
- 13.34%
SDOG vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 14.96% | 11.12% | 14.70% | 4.19% | -0.20% | 24.59% | -0.35% | 24.02% | -11.43% | 12.65% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 6.98% | 14.17% | 16.99% | 14.51% | -9.80% | 23.76% | 15.43% | 29.62% | -2.08% | 22.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDOG and VIG is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2012 | 0.80 |
The correlation between SDOG and VIG shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SDOG vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SDOG
VIG
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
SDOG
VIG
Technology
SDOG
VIG
Financial Services
SDOG
VIG
Healthcare
SDOG
VIG
Consumer Defensive
SDOG
VIG
Utilities
SDOG
VIG
Energy
SDOG
VIG
Communication Services
SDOG
VIG
Industrials
SDOG
VIG
Basic Materials
SDOG
VIG
Real Estate
SDOG
-
VIG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDOG vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank
SDOG
VIG
SDOG vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SDOG | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.33 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.95 | 2.34 | +1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.53 | 9.44 | +3.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SDOG vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDOG drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, smaller than the maximum VIG drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDOG and VIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDOG | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.56% | -46.81% | +3.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.24% | -7.91% | +1.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.00% | -14.95% | -1.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.84% | -20.39% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.56% | -31.72% | -11.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -1.13% | -0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.90% | -5.50% | +0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 1.96% | 0.00% |
Volatility
SDOG vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) has a higher volatility of 3.71% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) at 2.89%. This indicates that SDOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDOG | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.71% | 2.89% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.18% | 7.70% | +0.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.60% | 10.14% | +1.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.37% | 14.23% | +1.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.02% | 16.04% | +2.98% |
SDOG vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDOG has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDOG vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison
SDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than VIG's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 3.49% | 3.68% | 3.86% | 4.29% | 3.87% | 3.62% | 3.63% | 3.37% | 4.03% | 3.27% | 3.32% | 3.61% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.47% | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.96% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.08% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDOG and VIG have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SDOG has higher volatility (3.71%) compared to VIG (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDOG dropped -43.56% vs VIG's -46.81%.
On 10-year performance, VIG leads with 13.34% vs 9.96% for SDOG. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VIG has performed better with a 13.34% return vs 9.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for SDOG.
SDOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 1.47% for VIG.
SDOG is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VIG is Dividend. SDOG tracks S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for SDOG and 0.04% for VIG.
SDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDOG and VIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer