SDOG vs. SPY
SDOG (ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SDOG is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SDOG returned 9.96%/yr vs 15.53%/yr for SPY. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SDOG charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
SDOG vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDOG achieves a 14.96% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 8.15% return. Over the past 10 years, SDOG has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 9.96%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.53% annualized return.
SDOG
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- YTD
- 14.96%
- 6M
- 14.84%
- 1Y
- 24.50%
- 3Y*
- 16.57%
- 5Y*
- 9.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.96%
SPY
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- 8.15%
- 6M
- 7.20%
- 1Y
- 23.59%
- 3Y*
- 20.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- 15.53%
SDOG vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 14.96% | 11.12% | 14.70% | 4.19% | -0.20% | 24.59% | -0.35% | 24.02% | -11.43% | 12.65% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8.15% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDOG and SPY is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2012 | 0.76 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SDOG and SPY has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SDOG vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SDOG
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
SDOG
SPY
Technology
SDOG
SPY
Financial Services
SDOG
SPY
Healthcare
SDOG
SPY
Consumer Defensive
SDOG
SPY
Utilities
SDOG
SPY
Energy
SDOG
SPY
Communication Services
SDOG
SPY
Industrials
SDOG
SPY
Basic Materials
SDOG
SPY
Real Estate
SDOG
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDOG vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
SDOG
SPY
SDOG vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SDOG | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.34 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.95 | 2.67 | +1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.53 | 11.92 | +0.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SDOG vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDOG drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDOG and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDOG | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.56% | -55.19% | +11.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.24% | -8.88% | +2.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.00% | -18.76% | +2.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.84% | -24.50% | +4.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.56% | -33.72% | -9.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -3.17% | +1.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.90% | -9.04% | +4.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 1.98% | -0.02% |
Volatility
SDOG vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) is 3.71%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 4.87%. This indicates that SDOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDOG | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.71% | 4.87% | -1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.18% | 9.85% | -1.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.60% | 12.50% | -0.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.37% | 17.15% | -1.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.02% | 17.95% | +1.07% |
SDOG vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDOG has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDOG vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
SDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than SPY's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 3.49% | 3.68% | 3.86% | 4.29% | 3.87% | 3.62% | 3.63% | 3.37% | 4.03% | 3.27% | 3.32% | 3.61% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDOG and SPY have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPY has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to SDOG (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDOG dropped -43.56% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.53% vs 9.96% for SDOG. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SDOG has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.53% return vs 9.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for SDOG.
SDOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 1.03% for SPY.
SDOG is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. SDOG tracks S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for SDOG and 0.09% for SPY.
SDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDOG and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer