QDEF vs. MGV
Compare and contrast key facts about FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV).
QDEF and MGV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QDEF is a passively managed fund by Northern Trust that tracks the performance of the Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index. It was launched on Dec 14, 2012. MGV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Large Cap Value Index. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007. Both QDEF and MGV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QDEF or MGV.
Correlation
The correlation between QDEF and MGV is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
QDEF vs. MGV - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
QDEF:
2.30
MGV:
1.75
QDEF:
3.17
MGV:
2.51
QDEF:
1.42
MGV:
1.32
QDEF:
4.32
MGV:
2.52
QDEF:
14.41
MGV:
9.29
QDEF:
1.58%
MGV:
1.91%
QDEF:
9.89%
MGV:
10.15%
QDEF:
-35.74%
MGV:
-56.31%
QDEF:
-3.03%
MGV:
-5.12%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDEF achieves a 22.60% return, which is significantly higher than MGV's 17.87% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QDEF having a 10.31% annualized return and MGV not far behind at 10.29%.
QDEF
22.60%
-2.72%
9.57%
22.44%
10.75%
10.31%
MGV
17.87%
-4.82%
7.48%
17.73%
10.37%
10.29%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QDEF vs. MGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDEF has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than MGV's 0.07% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QDEF vs. MGV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QDEF vs. MGV - Dividend Comparison
QDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than MGV's 2.29% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDEF FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund | 1.83% | 2.21% | 2.42% | 1.84% | 2.50% | 3.17% | 7.10% | 2.70% | 2.90% | 3.01% | 2.51% | 2.12% |
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 2.29% | 2.48% | 2.45% | 2.17% | 2.47% | 2.69% | 2.65% | 2.34% | 2.53% | 2.59% | 2.26% | 2.29% |
Drawdowns
QDEF vs. MGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDEF drawdown since its inception was -35.74%, smaller than the maximum MGV drawdown of -56.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDEF and MGV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QDEF vs. MGV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) is 2.96%, while Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) has a volatility of 3.27%. This indicates that QDEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.