PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDEF vs. SCHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDEF vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDEF achieves a 6.76% return, which is significantly lower than SCHB's 8.88% return. Over the past 10 years, QDEF has underperformed SCHB with an annualized return of 12.28%, while SCHB has yielded a comparatively higher 15.12% annualized return.


QDEF

1D
-0.48%
1M
-1.73%
YTD
6.76%
6M
5.91%
1Y
20.63%
3Y*
18.58%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*
12.28%

SCHB

1D
-1.39%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
8.88%
6M
7.77%
1Y
24.10%
3Y*
20.64%
5Y*
11.98%
10Y*
15.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDEF vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QDEF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund
6.76%17.43%21.19%17.48%-10.94%26.04%3.15%24.90%-4.10%17.04%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
8.88%16.94%23.93%26.16%-19.46%25.84%20.76%30.79%-5.43%21.20%

Correlation

The correlation between QDEF and SCHB is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2012

0.90

The correlation between QDEF and SCHB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

QDEF vs. SCHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QDEF
SCHB

Technology

35.4%
37.3%

Healthcare

11.2%
8.8%

Financial Services

10.9%
11.4%

Communication Services

7.3%
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

7.2%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%
9.8%

Industrials

6.4%
9.1%

Real Estate

5.3%
2.3%

Energy

3.5%
3.3%

Basic Materials

2.9%
1.9%

Utilities

2.8%
2.1%

Technology

QDEF
35.4%
SCHB
37.3%

Healthcare

QDEF
11.2%
SCHB
8.8%

Financial Services

QDEF
10.9%
SCHB
11.4%

Communication Services

QDEF
7.3%
SCHB
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

QDEF
7.2%
SCHB
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

QDEF
7.2%
SCHB
9.8%

Industrials

QDEF
6.4%
SCHB
9.1%

Real Estate

QDEF
5.3%
SCHB
2.3%

Energy

QDEF
3.5%
SCHB
3.3%

Basic Materials

QDEF
2.9%
SCHB
1.9%

Utilities

QDEF
2.8%
SCHB
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDEF vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDEF
QDEF Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHB
SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDEF vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QDEFSCHBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.34

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

2.72

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.62

12.04

+0.57

QDEF vs. SCHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDEF Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the SCHB Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDEF and SCHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QDEF vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDEF drawdown since its inception was -35.74%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHB drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDEF and SCHB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDEFSCHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.74%

-35.27%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.95%

-8.91%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.43%

-19.34%

+4.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.37%

-25.41%

+4.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.74%

-35.27%

-0.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.35%

-2.86%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.29%

-4.11%

+0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

2.01%

-0.37%

Volatility

QDEF vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) is 3.06%, while Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that QDEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDEFSCHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

5.00%

-1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.51%

10.09%

-2.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.83%

12.83%

-3.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.80%

17.35%

-3.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.16%

18.34%

-2.18%

QDEF vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDEF has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDEF vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison

QDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than SCHB's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QDEF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund
1.63%1.74%1.85%2.21%2.42%1.84%2.50%3.17%7.10%2.70%2.90%3.00%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
1.04%1.11%1.24%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.00%1.65%1.86%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, QDEF and SCHB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHB has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to QDEF (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDEF dropped -35.74% vs SCHB's -35.27%.

On 10-year performance, SCHB leads with 15.12% vs 12.28% for QDEF. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, QDEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHB has performed better with a 15.12% return vs 12.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for QDEF.

QDEF has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 1.04% for SCHB.

QDEF is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHB is Large Cap Blend Equities. QDEF tracks Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index, while SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for QDEF and 0.03% for SCHB.

QDEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDEF and SCHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer