QDEF vs. ^SP500TR
QDEF (FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund) is Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index, while ^SP500TR (S&P 500 Total Return) is an index. Over the past 10 years, QDEF returned 12.39%/yr vs 15.68%/yr for ^SP500TR. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
QDEF vs. ^SP500TR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDEF achieves a 9.33% return, which is significantly lower than ^SP500TR's 11.72% return. Over the past 10 years, QDEF has underperformed ^SP500TR with an annualized return of 12.39%, while ^SP500TR has yielded a comparatively higher 15.68% annualized return.
QDEF
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 3.66%
- YTD
- 9.33%
- 6M
- 9.70%
- 1Y
- 24.69%
- 3Y*
- 19.79%
- 5Y*
- 12.90%
- 10Y*
- 12.39%
^SP500TR
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 5.38%
- YTD
- 11.72%
- 6M
- 12.09%
- 1Y
- 29.76%
- 3Y*
- 22.77%
- 5Y*
- 14.29%
- 10Y*
- 15.68%
QDEF vs. ^SP500TR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDEF FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund | 9.33% | 17.43% | 21.19% | 17.48% | -10.94% | 26.04% | 3.15% | 24.90% | -4.10% | 17.04% |
^SP500TR S&P 500 Total Return | 11.72% | 17.88% | 25.02% | 26.29% | -18.11% | 28.71% | 18.40% | 31.49% | -4.38% | 21.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDEF and ^SP500TR is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2012 | 0.91 |
The correlation between QDEF and ^SP500TR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDEF vs. ^SP500TR — Risk / Return Rank
QDEF
^SP500TR
QDEF vs. ^SP500TR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) and S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDEF | ^SP500TR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.58 | 2.52 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.65 | 3.43 | +0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.46 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.60 | 3.41 | +0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.68 | 15.97 | -0.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDEF | ^SP500TR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.58 | 2.52 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.85 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.87 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.65 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
QDEF vs. ^SP500TR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDEF drawdown since its inception was -35.74%, smaller than the maximum ^SP500TR drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDEF and ^SP500TR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDEF | ^SP500TR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.74% | -55.25% | +19.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.95% | -8.89% | +1.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.43% | -18.75% | +4.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.37% | -24.49% | +3.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.74% | -33.79% | -1.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.29% | -8.17% | +4.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | 1.90% | -0.30% |
Volatility
QDEF vs. ^SP500TR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) is 2.41%, while S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR) has a volatility of 2.83%. This indicates that QDEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^SP500TR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDEF | ^SP500TR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.41% | 2.83% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.17% | 8.98% | -1.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.61% | 11.86% | -2.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.78% | 16.90% | -3.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.17% | 18.07% | -1.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, QDEF and ^SP500TR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
^SP500TR has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to QDEF (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDEF dropped -35.74% vs ^SP500TR's -55.25%.
QDEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QDEF and ^SP500TR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer