PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MGV vs. JNJ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MGV and JNJ is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

MGV vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
6.59%
-3.18%
MGV
JNJ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MGV:

2.08

JNJ:

-0.35

Sortino Ratio

MGV:

2.93

JNJ:

-0.41

Omega Ratio

MGV:

1.37

JNJ:

0.95

Calmar Ratio

MGV:

3.07

JNJ:

-0.31

Martin Ratio

MGV:

9.57

JNJ:

-0.79

Ulcer Index

MGV:

2.27%

JNJ:

6.88%

Daily Std Dev

MGV:

10.40%

JNJ:

15.48%

Max Drawdown

MGV:

-56.31%

JNJ:

-52.60%

Current Drawdown

MGV:

-2.98%

JNJ:

-14.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGV achieves a 3.07% return, which is significantly higher than JNJ's 1.67% return. Over the past 10 years, MGV has outperformed JNJ with an annualized return of 10.75%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively lower 6.63% annualized return.


MGV

YTD

3.07%

1M

3.24%

6M

6.59%

1Y

20.10%

5Y*

10.76%

10Y*

10.75%

JNJ

YTD

1.67%

1M

1.77%

6M

-3.18%

1Y

-6.18%

5Y*

2.65%

10Y*

6.63%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MGV vs. JNJ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MGV is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MGV is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MGV is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MGV is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MGV is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MGV is 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

JNJ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of JNJ is 2525
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of JNJ is 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of JNJ is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of JNJ is 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of JNJ is 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of JNJ is 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MGV vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MGV, currently valued at 2.08, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.08-0.35
The chart of Sortino ratio for MGV, currently valued at 2.93, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.93-0.41
The chart of Omega ratio for MGV, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.370.95
The chart of Calmar ratio for MGV, currently valued at 3.07, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.003.07-0.31
The chart of Martin ratio for MGV, currently valued at 9.57, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.009.57-0.79
MGV
JNJ

The current MGV Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the JNJ Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGV and JNJ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.08
-0.35
MGV
JNJ

Dividends

MGV vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison

MGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, less than JNJ's 3.34% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
2.24%2.31%2.48%2.45%2.17%2.47%2.69%2.65%2.34%2.53%2.59%2.26%
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
3.34%3.40%3.00%2.52%2.45%2.53%2.57%2.74%2.38%2.73%2.87%2.64%

Drawdowns

MGV vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGV drawdown since its inception was -56.31%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -52.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGV and JNJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-2.98%
-14.32%
MGV
JNJ

Volatility

MGV vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) is 4.19%, while Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) has a volatility of 5.21%. This indicates that MGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
4.19%
5.21%
MGV
JNJ
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab