PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGV vs. JNJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGV vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGV achieves a 15.89% return, which is significantly lower than JNJ's 16.81% return. Over the past 10 years, MGV has outperformed JNJ with an annualized return of 13.34%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively lower 10.52% annualized return.


MGV

1D
-0.82%
1M
3.65%
YTD
15.89%
6M
15.48%
1Y
28.43%
3Y*
19.53%
5Y*
12.99%
10Y*
13.34%

JNJ

1D
3.37%
1M
2.61%
YTD
16.81%
6M
17.47%
1Y
61.94%
3Y*
16.40%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
10.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGV vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
15.89%15.45%16.94%9.16%-1.22%25.93%2.50%25.54%-4.13%16.85%
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
16.81%47.48%-4.81%-8.58%5.97%11.44%10.82%16.22%-5.13%24.43%

Correlation

The correlation between MGV and JNJ is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007

0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between MGV and JNJ has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGV vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGV
MGV Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
MGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGV Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
MGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

JNJ
JNJ Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
JNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
JNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGV vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGVJNJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.64

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.45

5.68

-1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.89

16.53

+0.36

MGV vs. JNJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGV Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is comparable to the JNJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGV and JNJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGV vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGV drawdown since its inception was -56.07%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGV and JNJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGVJNJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.07%

-50.67%

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.42%

-10.96%

+4.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.18%

-15.95%

+2.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.54%

-18.41%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.41%

-27.37%

-8.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-3.26%

+2.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.77%

-11.90%

+4.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

3.76%

-2.07%

Volatility

MGV vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) is 3.49%, while Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) has a volatility of 7.05%. This indicates that MGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGVJNJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

7.05%

-3.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.82%

12.69%

-4.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.18%

17.40%

-7.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.58%

16.99%

-3.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.32%

18.54%

-2.22%

Dividends

MGV vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison

MGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than JNJ's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
2.19%2.48%3.40%3.00%2.52%2.45%2.53%2.57%2.74%2.38%2.73%2.87%
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
1.84%2.04%2.31%2.48%2.45%2.17%2.47%2.69%2.65%2.34%2.53%2.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGV and JNJ have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JNJ has higher volatility (7.05%) compared to MGV (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGV dropped -56.07% vs JNJ's -50.67%.

JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.58 vs 2.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGV and JNJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer