MGV vs. MGC
MGV (Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF) and MGC (Vanguard Mega Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MGV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index, while MGC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MGV returned 13.43%/yr vs 16.51%/yr for MGC. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.05% expense ratio.
Performance
MGV vs. MGC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGV achieves a 16.85% return, which is significantly higher than MGC's 9.05% return. Over the past 10 years, MGV has underperformed MGC with an annualized return of 13.43%, while MGC has yielded a comparatively higher 16.51% annualized return.
MGV
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- 16.85%
- 6M
- 16.55%
- 1Y
- 30.47%
- 3Y*
- 19.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.34%
- 10Y*
- 13.43%
MGC
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- YTD
- 9.05%
- 6M
- 8.78%
- 1Y
- 27.57%
- 3Y*
- 22.54%
- 5Y*
- 14.13%
- 10Y*
- 16.51%
MGV vs. MGC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 16.85% | 15.45% | 16.94% | 9.16% | -1.22% | 25.93% | 2.50% | 25.54% | -4.13% | 16.85% |
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | 9.05% | 19.31% | 27.16% | 29.77% | -19.95% | 27.58% | 21.57% | 31.14% | -3.45% | 22.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGV and MGC is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007 | 0.88 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MGV and MGC has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
MGV vs. MGC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MGV
MGC
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
MGV
MGC
Technology
MGV
MGC
Healthcare
MGV
MGC
Industrials
MGV
MGC
Consumer Defensive
MGV
MGC
Energy
MGV
MGC
Consumer Cyclical
MGV
MGC
Communication Services
MGV
MGC
Basic Materials
MGV
MGC
Utilities
MGV
MGC
Real Estate
MGV
MGC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGV vs. MGC — Risk / Return Rank
MGV
MGC
MGV vs. MGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MGV | MGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.38 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.77 | 2.81 | +1.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.12 | 12.20 | +5.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MGV vs. MGC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGV drawdown since its inception was -56.07%, which is greater than MGC's maximum drawdown of -52.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGV and MGC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGV | MGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.07% | -52.26% | -3.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.42% | -9.85% | +3.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.18% | -19.28% | +6.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.54% | -25.74% | +9.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.41% | -33.07% | -2.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.36% | +2.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.78% | -7.17% | -0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 2.27% | -0.58% |
Volatility
MGV vs. MGC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) is 3.32%, while Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that MGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGV | MGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.32% | 5.00% | -1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.77% | 10.23% | -2.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.15% | 13.01% | -2.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.57% | 17.37% | -3.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 18.27% | -1.91% |
MGV vs. MGC - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MGV and MGC have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MGV vs. MGC - Dividend Comparison
MGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, more than MGC's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | 0.88% | 0.93% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.65% | 1.17% | 1.45% | 1.81% | 2.10% | 1.83% | 2.14% | 2.11% |
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 1.82% | 2.04% | 2.31% | 2.48% | 2.45% | 2.17% | 2.47% | 2.69% | 2.65% | 2.34% | 2.53% | 2.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGV and MGC have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MGC has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to MGV (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGV dropped -56.07% vs MGC's -52.26%.
On 10-year performance, MGC leads with 16.51% vs 13.43% for MGV. Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. On volatility, MGV has been the lower-risk option at 3.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MGC has performed better with a 16.51% return vs 13.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MGV and MGC have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.
MGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.88% for MGC.
MGV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while MGC is Large Cap Blend Equities. MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index, while MGC tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Index.
MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGV and MGC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer