PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGV vs. MGC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGV vs. MGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGV achieves a 16.85% return, which is significantly higher than MGC's 9.05% return. Over the past 10 years, MGV has underperformed MGC with an annualized return of 13.43%, while MGC has yielded a comparatively higher 16.51% annualized return.


MGV

1D
1.09%
1M
4.51%
YTD
16.85%
6M
16.55%
1Y
30.47%
3Y*
19.86%
5Y*
13.34%
10Y*
13.43%

MGC

1D
-0.63%
1M
-0.40%
YTD
9.05%
6M
8.78%
1Y
27.57%
3Y*
22.54%
5Y*
14.13%
10Y*
16.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGV vs. MGC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
16.85%15.45%16.94%9.16%-1.22%25.93%2.50%25.54%-4.13%16.85%
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
9.05%19.31%27.16%29.77%-19.95%27.58%21.57%31.14%-3.45%22.61%

Correlation

The correlation between MGV and MGC is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007

0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between MGV and MGC has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MGV vs. MGC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MGV
MGC

Financial Services

22.8%
10.9%

Technology

18.5%
42.9%

Healthcare

16.0%
8.6%

Industrials

13.2%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

11.0%
4.4%

Energy

6.0%
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

3.4%
9.8%

Communication Services

3.2%
12.3%

Basic Materials

2.3%
1.1%

Utilities

2.3%
0.9%

Real Estate

1.2%
0.9%

Financial Services

MGV
22.8%
MGC
10.9%

Technology

MGV
18.5%
MGC
42.9%

Healthcare

MGV
16.0%
MGC
8.6%

Industrials

MGV
13.2%
MGC
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

MGV
11.0%
MGC
4.4%

Energy

MGV
6.0%
MGC
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

MGV
3.4%
MGC
9.8%

Communication Services

MGV
3.2%
MGC
12.3%

Basic Materials

MGV
2.3%
MGC
1.1%

Utilities

MGV
2.3%
MGC
0.9%

Real Estate

MGV
1.2%
MGC
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGV vs. MGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGV
MGV Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
MGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGV Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
MGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGV Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

MGC
MGC Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
MGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGC Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
MGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGC Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGV vs. MGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGVMGCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.38

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.77

2.81

+1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.12

12.20

+5.92

MGV vs. MGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGV Sharpe Ratio is 3.02, which is higher than the MGC Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGV and MGC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGV vs. MGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGV drawdown since its inception was -56.07%, which is greater than MGC's maximum drawdown of -52.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGV and MGC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGVMGCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.07%

-52.26%

-3.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.42%

-9.85%

+3.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.18%

-19.28%

+6.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.54%

-25.74%

+9.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.41%

-33.07%

-2.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.36%

+2.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.78%

-7.17%

-0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

2.27%

-0.58%

Volatility

MGV vs. MGC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) is 3.32%, while Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that MGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGVMGCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

5.00%

-1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.77%

10.23%

-2.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.15%

13.01%

-2.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.57%

17.37%

-3.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.36%

18.27%

-1.91%

MGV vs. MGC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MGV and MGC have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MGV vs. MGC - Dividend Comparison

MGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, more than MGC's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
0.88%0.93%1.15%1.35%1.65%1.17%1.45%1.81%2.10%1.83%2.14%2.11%
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
1.82%2.04%2.31%2.48%2.45%2.17%2.47%2.69%2.65%2.34%2.53%2.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGV and MGC have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGC has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to MGV (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGV dropped -56.07% vs MGC's -52.26%.

On 10-year performance, MGC leads with 16.51% vs 13.43% for MGV. Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. On volatility, MGV has been the lower-risk option at 3.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MGC has performed better with a 16.51% return vs 13.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MGV and MGC have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.

MGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.88% for MGC.

MGV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while MGC is Large Cap Blend Equities. MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index, while MGC tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Index.

MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGV and MGC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer