MGV vs. VYM
MGV (Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF) and VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MGV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index, while VYM is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MGV returned 13.34%/yr vs 11.98%/yr for VYM. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MGV charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VYM.
Performance
MGV vs. VYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGV achieves a 15.89% return, which is significantly higher than VYM's 11.51% return. Over the past 10 years, MGV has outperformed VYM with an annualized return of 13.34%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.98% annualized return.
MGV
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 3.65%
- YTD
- 15.89%
- 6M
- 15.48%
- 1Y
- 28.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.53%
- 5Y*
- 12.99%
- 10Y*
- 13.34%
VYM
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 11.51%
- 6M
- 10.83%
- 1Y
- 24.08%
- 3Y*
- 18.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.88%
- 10Y*
- 11.98%
MGV vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 15.89% | 15.45% | 16.94% | 9.16% | -1.22% | 25.93% | 2.50% | 25.54% | -4.13% | 16.85% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 11.51% | 15.42% | 17.60% | 6.57% | -0.43% | 26.20% | 1.15% | 24.06% | -5.92% | 16.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGV and VYM is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007 | 0.97 |
The correlation between MGV and VYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
MGV vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MGV
VYM
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
MGV
VYM
Technology
MGV
VYM
Healthcare
MGV
VYM
Industrials
MGV
VYM
Consumer Defensive
MGV
VYM
Energy
MGV
VYM
Consumer Cyclical
MGV
VYM
Communication Services
MGV
VYM
Basic Materials
MGV
VYM
Utilities
MGV
VYM
Real Estate
MGV
VYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGV vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank
MGV
VYM
MGV vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MGV | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.42 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.45 | 3.61 | +0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.89 | 13.43 | +3.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MGV vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGV drawdown since its inception was -56.07%, roughly equal to the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGV and VYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGV | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.07% | -56.98% | +0.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.42% | -6.69% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.18% | -14.46% | +1.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.54% | -15.84% | -0.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.41% | -35.21% | -0.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.82% | -1.28% | +0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.77% | -7.18% | -0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 1.80% | -0.11% |
Volatility
MGV vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 3.02%. This indicates that MGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGV | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.49% | 3.02% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.82% | 7.64% | +0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.18% | 10.39% | -0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.58% | 13.93% | -0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.32% | 16.32% | 0.00% |
MGV vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MGV vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison
MGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than VYM's 2.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 1.84% | 2.04% | 2.31% | 2.48% | 2.45% | 2.17% | 2.47% | 2.69% | 2.65% | 2.34% | 2.53% | 2.59% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.30% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, MGV and VYM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MGV has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to VYM (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGV dropped -56.07% vs VYM's -56.98%.
On 10-year performance, MGV leads with 13.34% vs 11.98% for VYM. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MGV has performed better with a 13.34% return vs 11.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for MGV.
VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.30%, compared with 1.84% for MGV.
MGV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VYM is Dividend. MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGV and 0.04% for VYM.
MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGV and VYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer