PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
QDEF vs. QDF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QDEF and QDF is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

QDEF vs. QDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) and FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
5.91%
6.11%
QDEF
QDF

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QDEF:

2.12

QDF:

1.57

Sortino Ratio

QDEF:

2.93

QDF:

2.16

Omega Ratio

QDEF:

1.39

QDF:

1.29

Calmar Ratio

QDEF:

3.93

QDF:

3.08

Martin Ratio

QDEF:

11.00

QDF:

8.59

Ulcer Index

QDEF:

1.90%

QDF:

2.06%

Daily Std Dev

QDEF:

9.87%

QDF:

11.32%

Max Drawdown

QDEF:

-35.74%

QDF:

-36.66%

Current Drawdown

QDEF:

-0.55%

QDF:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDEF achieves a 3.76% return, which is significantly lower than QDF's 3.99% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QDEF having a 10.31% annualized return and QDF not far behind at 9.99%.


QDEF

YTD

3.76%

1M

2.40%

6M

5.91%

1Y

22.07%

5Y*

11.12%

10Y*

10.31%

QDF

YTD

3.99%

1M

2.58%

6M

6.11%

1Y

18.98%

5Y*

11.20%

10Y*

9.99%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QDEF vs. QDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QDEF and QDF have an expense ratio of 0.37%.


QDEF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund
Expense ratio chart for QDEF: current value at 0.37% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.37%
Expense ratio chart for QDF: current value at 0.37% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.37%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

QDEF vs. QDF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDEF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QDEF is 8484
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QDEF is 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QDEF is 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QDEF is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QDEF is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QDEF is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

QDF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QDF is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QDF is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QDF is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QDF is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QDF is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QDF is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QDEF vs. QDF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) and FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for QDEF, currently valued at 2.12, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.121.57
The chart of Sortino ratio for QDEF, currently valued at 2.93, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.932.16
The chart of Omega ratio for QDEF, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.391.29
The chart of Calmar ratio for QDEF, currently valued at 3.93, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.933.08
The chart of Martin ratio for QDEF, currently valued at 11.00, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0011.008.59
QDEF
QDF

The current QDEF Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the QDF Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDEF and QDF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.504.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.12
1.57
QDEF
QDF

Dividends

QDEF vs. QDF - Dividend Comparison

QDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than QDF's 1.86% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
QDEF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund
1.79%1.85%2.21%2.42%1.84%2.50%3.17%7.10%2.70%2.90%3.01%2.51%
QDF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund
1.86%1.93%2.18%2.45%1.90%2.38%3.05%4.30%2.70%3.07%3.04%2.69%

Drawdowns

QDEF vs. QDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDEF drawdown since its inception was -35.74%, roughly equal to the maximum QDF drawdown of -36.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDEF and QDF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.55%
0
QDEF
QDF

Volatility

QDEF vs. QDF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) is 2.00%, while FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) has a volatility of 2.35%. This indicates that QDEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.00%
2.35%
QDEF
QDF
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab