QDEF vs. QDIV
QDEF (FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund) and QDIV (Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF) are both Quality Factor funds - QDEF tracks the Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index while QDIV tracks the S&P 500 Quality High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QDEF returned 12.34%/yr vs 8.39%/yr for QDIV. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QDEF charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QDIV.
Performance
QDEF vs. QDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDEF achieves a 10.48% return, which is significantly lower than QDIV's 16.03% return.
QDEF
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 8.64%
- YTD
- 10.48%
- 1Y
- 20.97%
- 3Y*
- 17.66%
- 5Y*
- 12.34%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.72%
QDIV
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 3.88%
- 6M
- 9.20%
- YTD
- 16.03%
- 1Y
- 21.61%
- 3Y*
- 10.13%
- 5Y*
- 8.39%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.17%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $546.87K | $522.47K | $732.31K | |
| $39.86K | $80.99K | $126.73K |
QDEF vs. QDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDEF FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund | 10.48% | 17.43% | 21.19% | 17.48% | -10.94% | 26.04% | 3.15% | 24.90% | -7.75% |
QDIV Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF | 16.03% | 3.16% | 10.62% | 5.18% | -0.50% | 28.99% | 0.03% | 29.00% | -12.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDEF and QDIV is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2018 | 0.78 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QDEF and QDIV has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
QDEF vs. QDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QDEF
QDIV
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Energy
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Technology
QDEF
QDIV
Financial Services
QDEF
QDIV
Healthcare
QDEF
QDIV
Consumer Defensive
QDEF
QDIV
Consumer Cyclical
QDEF
QDIV
Communication Services
QDEF
QDIV
Industrials
QDEF
QDIV
Energy
QDEF
QDIV
Real Estate
QDEF
QDIV
-
Utilities
QDEF
QDIV
-
Basic Materials
QDEF
QDIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDEF vs. QDIV — Risk / Return Rank
QDEF
QDIV
QDEF vs. QDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) and Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QDEF | QDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.30 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 2.61 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.20 | 6.67 | +5.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QDEF vs. QDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDEF drawdown since its inception was -35.74%, smaller than the maximum QDIV drawdown of -41.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDEF and QDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDEF | QDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.74% | -41.20% | +5.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.95% | -7.97% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.43% | -16.81% | +2.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.37% | -18.52% | -2.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -1.55% | +0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.27% | -5.47% | +2.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 3.12% | -1.45% |
Volatility
QDEF vs. QDIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) is 2.29%, while Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) has a volatility of 5.14%. This indicates that QDEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDEF | QDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.29% | 5.14% | -2.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.47% | 9.14% | -1.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.85% | 12.39% | -2.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.77% | 15.32% | -1.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.14% | 19.35% | -3.21% |
QDEF vs. QDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDEF has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than QDIV's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDEF vs. QDIV - Dividend Comparison
QDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than QDIV's 2.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDEF FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund | 1.58% | 1.74% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 2.42% | 1.84% | 2.50% | 3.17% | 7.10% | 2.70% | 2.90% | 3.00% |
QDIV Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF | 2.81% | 3.13% | 2.88% | 3.26% | 3.02% | 2.44% | 3.06% | 2.84% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDEF and QDIV have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QDIV has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to QDEF (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDEF dropped -35.74% vs QDIV's -41.20%.
On 5-year performance, QDEF leads with 12.34% vs 8.39% for QDIV. On fees, QDIV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QDEF has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QDEF has performed better with a 12.34% return vs 8.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QDIV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for QDEF.
QDIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 1.58% for QDEF.
QDEF tracks Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index, while QDIV tracks S&P 500 Quality High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for QDEF and 0.20% for QDIV.
QDEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QDEF and QDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer