PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDEF vs. QDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDEF vs. QDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) and Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDEF achieves a 10.48% return, which is significantly lower than QDIV's 16.03% return.


QDEF

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.68%
6M
8.64%
YTD
10.48%
1Y
20.97%
3Y*
17.66%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*
12.14%
ALL TIME*
12.72%

QDIV

1D
0.10%
1M
3.88%
6M
9.20%
YTD
16.03%
1Y
21.61%
3Y*
10.13%
5Y*
8.39%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$546.87K$522.47K$732.31K
$39.86K$80.99K$126.73K

QDEF vs. QDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QDEF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund
10.48%17.43%21.19%17.48%-10.94%26.04%3.15%24.90%-7.75%
QDIV
Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF
16.03%3.16%10.62%5.18%-0.50%28.99%0.03%29.00%-12.20%

Correlation

The correlation between QDEF and QDIV is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2018

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between QDEF and QDIV has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

QDEF vs. QDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QDEF
QDIV

Technology

35.6%
10.7%

Financial Services

11.7%
20.1%

Healthcare

10.5%
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.3%
22.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
5.8%

Communication Services

5.8%
3.5%

Industrials

5.5%
16.6%

Energy

4.2%
8.9%

Real Estate

3.9%

-

Utilities

3.6%

-

Basic Materials

3.5%
2.1%

Technology

QDEF
35.6%
QDIV
10.7%

Financial Services

QDEF
11.7%
QDIV
20.1%

Healthcare

QDEF
10.5%
QDIV
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

QDEF
7.3%
QDIV
22.1%

Consumer Cyclical

QDEF
7.3%
QDIV
5.8%

Communication Services

QDEF
5.8%
QDIV
3.5%

Industrials

QDEF
5.5%
QDIV
16.6%

Energy

QDEF
4.2%
QDIV
8.9%

Real Estate

QDEF
3.9%
QDIV

-

Utilities

QDEF
3.6%
QDIV

-

Basic Materials

QDEF
3.5%
QDIV
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDEF vs. QDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QDEF
QDEF Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
QDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
QDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

QDIV
QDIV Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
QDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
QDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QDEF vs. QDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) and Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QDEFQDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.30

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

2.61

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.20

6.67

+5.53

QDEF vs. QDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDEF Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the QDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDEF and QDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QDEF vs. QDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDEF drawdown since its inception was -35.74%, smaller than the maximum QDIV drawdown of -41.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDEF and QDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDEFQDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.74%

-41.20%

+5.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.95%

-7.97%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.43%

-16.81%

+2.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.37%

-18.52%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-1.55%

+0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.27%

-5.47%

+2.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

3.12%

-1.45%

Volatility

QDEF vs. QDIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) is 2.29%, while Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) has a volatility of 5.14%. This indicates that QDEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDEFQDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.29%

5.14%

-2.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.47%

9.14%

-1.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.85%

12.39%

-2.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.77%

15.32%

-1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.14%

19.35%

-3.21%

QDEF vs. QDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDEF has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than QDIV's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDEF vs. QDIV - Dividend Comparison

QDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than QDIV's 2.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QDEF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund
1.58%1.74%1.85%2.21%2.42%1.84%2.50%3.17%7.10%2.70%2.90%3.00%
QDIV
Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF
2.81%3.13%2.88%3.26%3.02%2.44%3.06%2.84%1.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDEF and QDIV have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QDIV has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to QDEF (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDEF dropped -35.74% vs QDIV's -41.20%.

On 5-year performance, QDEF leads with 12.34% vs 8.39% for QDIV. On fees, QDIV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QDEF has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QDEF has performed better with a 12.34% return vs 8.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QDIV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for QDEF.

QDIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 1.58% for QDEF.

QDEF tracks Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index, while QDIV tracks S&P 500 Quality High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for QDEF and 0.20% for QDIV.

QDEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDEF and QDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer