MGV vs. SPYV
MGV (Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF) and SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MGV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index, while SPYV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MGV returned 13.43%/yr vs 12.14%/yr for SPYV. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MGV charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYV.
Performance
MGV vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGV achieves a 16.85% return, which is significantly higher than SPYV's 7.78% return. Over the past 10 years, MGV has outperformed SPYV with an annualized return of 13.43%, while SPYV has yielded a comparatively lower 12.14% annualized return.
MGV
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- 16.85%
- 6M
- 16.55%
- 1Y
- 30.47%
- 3Y*
- 19.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.34%
- 10Y*
- 13.43%
SPYV
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- 7.78%
- 6M
- 7.25%
- 1Y
- 21.31%
- 3Y*
- 15.28%
- 5Y*
- 11.43%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
MGV vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 16.85% | 15.45% | 16.94% | 9.16% | -1.22% | 25.93% | 2.50% | 25.54% | -4.13% | 16.85% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 7.78% | 13.18% | 12.24% | 22.20% | -5.28% | 24.91% | 1.38% | 31.70% | -9.01% | 15.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGV and SPYV is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007 | 0.94 |
The correlation between MGV and SPYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
MGV vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MGV
SPYV
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
MGV
SPYV
Technology
MGV
SPYV
Healthcare
MGV
SPYV
Industrials
MGV
SPYV
Consumer Defensive
MGV
SPYV
Energy
MGV
SPYV
Consumer Cyclical
MGV
SPYV
Communication Services
MGV
SPYV
Basic Materials
MGV
SPYV
Utilities
MGV
SPYV
Real Estate
MGV
SPYV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGV vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank
MGV
SPYV
MGV vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MGV | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.39 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.77 | 3.44 | +1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.12 | 13.11 | +5.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MGV vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGV drawdown since its inception was -56.07%, roughly equal to the maximum SPYV drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGV and SPYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGV | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.07% | -58.45% | +2.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.42% | -6.22% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.18% | -17.54% | +4.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.54% | -17.89% | +1.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.41% | -36.89% | +1.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.96% | +0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.78% | -8.70% | +0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 1.63% | +0.06% |
Volatility
MGV vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) has a higher volatility of 3.32% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 2.88%. This indicates that MGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGV | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.32% | 2.88% | +0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.77% | 7.32% | +0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.15% | 9.98% | +0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.57% | 14.38% | -0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 16.95% | -0.59% |
MGV vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MGV vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison
MGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than SPYV's 2.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 1.82% | 2.04% | 2.31% | 2.48% | 2.45% | 2.17% | 2.47% | 2.69% | 2.65% | 2.34% | 2.53% | 2.59% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 2.14% | 1.77% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.77% | 2.39% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGV and SPYV have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MGV has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to SPYV (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGV dropped -56.07% vs SPYV's -58.45%.
On 10-year performance, MGV leads with 13.43% vs 12.14% for SPYV. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MGV has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 12.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for MGV.
SPYV has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 1.82% for MGV.
MGV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SPYV is S&P 500. MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index, while SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGV and 0.04% for SPYV.
MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGV and SPYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer