MGV vs. VIG
MGV (Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF) and VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MGV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index, while VIG is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MGV returned 13.34%/yr vs 13.34%/yr for VIG. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MGV charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VIG.
Performance
MGV vs. VIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGV achieves a 15.89% return, which is significantly higher than VIG's 6.98% return. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: MGV at 13.34% and VIG at 13.34%.
MGV
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 3.65%
- YTD
- 15.89%
- 6M
- 15.48%
- 1Y
- 28.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.53%
- 5Y*
- 12.99%
- 10Y*
- 13.34%
VIG
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 6.98%
- 6M
- 6.28%
- 1Y
- 18.42%
- 3Y*
- 15.85%
- 5Y*
- 10.82%
- 10Y*
- 13.34%
MGV vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 15.89% | 15.45% | 16.94% | 9.16% | -1.22% | 25.93% | 2.50% | 25.54% | -4.13% | 16.85% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 6.98% | 14.17% | 16.99% | 14.51% | -9.80% | 23.76% | 15.43% | 29.62% | -2.08% | 22.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGV and VIG is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007 | 0.92 |
The correlation between MGV and VIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
MGV vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MGV
VIG
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
MGV
VIG
Technology
MGV
VIG
Healthcare
MGV
VIG
Industrials
MGV
VIG
Consumer Defensive
MGV
VIG
Energy
MGV
VIG
Consumer Cyclical
MGV
VIG
Communication Services
MGV
VIG
Basic Materials
MGV
VIG
Utilities
MGV
VIG
Real Estate
MGV
VIG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGV vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank
MGV
VIG
MGV vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MGV | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.33 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.45 | 2.34 | +2.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.89 | 9.44 | +7.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MGV vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGV drawdown since its inception was -56.07%, which is greater than VIG's maximum drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGV and VIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGV | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.07% | -46.81% | -9.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.42% | -7.91% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.18% | -14.95% | +1.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.54% | -20.39% | +3.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.41% | -31.72% | -3.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.82% | -1.13% | +0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.77% | -5.50% | -2.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 1.96% | -0.27% |
Volatility
MGV vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) at 2.89%. This indicates that MGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGV | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.49% | 2.89% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.82% | 7.70% | +0.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.18% | 10.14% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.58% | 14.23% | -0.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.32% | 16.04% | +0.28% |
MGV vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MGV vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison
MGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, more than VIG's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 1.84% | 2.04% | 2.31% | 2.48% | 2.45% | 2.17% | 2.47% | 2.69% | 2.65% | 2.34% | 2.53% | 2.59% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.47% | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.96% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.08% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGV and VIG have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MGV has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to VIG (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGV dropped -56.07% vs VIG's -46.81%.
On 10-year performance, VIG leads with 13.34% vs 13.34% for MGV. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VIG has performed better with a 13.34% return vs 13.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for MGV.
MGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 1.47% for VIG.
MGV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VIG is Dividend. MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index, while VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGV and 0.04% for VIG.
MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGV and VIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer