MGV vs. VTV
MGV (Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds from Vanguard - MGV tracks the CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index while VTV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MGV returned 13.43%/yr vs 13.01%/yr for VTV. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MGV charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.
Performance
MGV vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGV achieves a 16.85% return, which is significantly higher than VTV's 15.12% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MGV having a 13.43% annualized return and VTV not far behind at 13.01%.
MGV
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- 16.85%
- 6M
- 16.55%
- 1Y
- 30.47%
- 3Y*
- 19.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.34%
- 10Y*
- 13.43%
VTV
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 3.67%
- YTD
- 15.12%
- 6M
- 14.64%
- 1Y
- 28.84%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 12.52%
- 10Y*
- 13.01%
MGV vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 16.85% | 15.45% | 16.94% | 9.16% | -1.22% | 25.93% | 2.50% | 25.54% | -4.13% | 16.85% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 15.12% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -5.47% | 17.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGV and VTV is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007 | 0.99 |
The correlation between MGV and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
MGV vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MGV
VTV
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
MGV
VTV
Technology
MGV
VTV
Healthcare
MGV
VTV
Industrials
MGV
VTV
Consumer Defensive
MGV
VTV
Energy
MGV
VTV
Consumer Cyclical
MGV
VTV
Communication Services
MGV
VTV
Basic Materials
MGV
VTV
Utilities
MGV
VTV
Real Estate
MGV
VTV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGV vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank
MGV
VTV
MGV vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MGV | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.50 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.77 | 4.56 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.12 | 17.20 | +0.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MGV vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGV drawdown since its inception was -56.07%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGV and VTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGV | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.07% | -59.27% | +3.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.42% | -6.35% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.18% | -14.52% | +1.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.54% | -17.04% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.41% | -36.78% | +1.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.78% | -7.85% | +0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 1.68% | +0.01% |
Volatility
MGV vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) have volatilities of 3.32% and 3.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGV | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.32% | 3.32% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.77% | 7.82% | -0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.15% | 10.39% | -0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.57% | 13.88% | -0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 16.69% | -0.33% |
MGV vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MGV vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
MGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, which matches VTV's 1.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 1.82% | 2.04% | 2.31% | 2.48% | 2.45% | 2.17% | 2.47% | 2.69% | 2.65% | 2.34% | 2.53% | 2.59% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.82% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, MGV and VTV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VTV has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to MGV (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGV dropped -56.07% vs VTV's -59.27%.
On 10-year performance, MGV leads with 13.43% vs 13.01% for VTV. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MGV has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 13.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for MGV.
MGV and VTV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.82%.
MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGV and 0.04% for VTV.
MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGV and VTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer