PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGV vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGV vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MGV having a 16.77% return and VTV slightly lower at 16.37%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MGV having a 12.87% annualized return and VTV not far behind at 12.57%.


MGV

1D
-0.23%
1M
-0.51%
6M
11.22%
YTD
16.77%
1Y
28.72%
3Y*
17.69%
5Y*
12.79%
10Y*
12.87%
ALL TIME*
9.30%

VTV

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.36%
6M
11.27%
YTD
16.37%
1Y
27.94%
3Y*
17.12%
5Y*
12.29%
10Y*
12.57%
ALL TIME*
9.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$37.04M$38.78M$39.74M
$688.19M$688.42M$619.05M

MGV vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
16.77%15.45%16.94%9.16%-1.22%25.93%2.50%25.54%-4.13%16.85%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
16.37%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between MGV and VTV is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007

0.99

The correlation between MGV and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

MGV vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MGV
VTV

Financial Services

23.1%
22.4%

Technology

18.1%
15.3%

Healthcare

16.7%
15.2%

Industrials

13.8%
14.3%

Consumer Defensive

10.7%
8.7%

Energy

5.5%
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

3.8%
3.9%

Communication Services

3.0%
2.9%

Basic Materials

2.3%
3.0%

Utilities

2.0%
4.8%

Real Estate

1.0%
2.5%

Financial Services

MGV
23.1%
VTV
22.4%

Technology

MGV
18.1%
VTV
15.3%

Healthcare

MGV
16.7%
VTV
15.2%

Industrials

MGV
13.8%
VTV
14.3%

Consumer Defensive

MGV
10.7%
VTV
8.7%

Energy

MGV
5.5%
VTV
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

MGV
3.8%
VTV
3.9%

Communication Services

MGV
3.0%
VTV
2.9%

Basic Materials

MGV
2.3%
VTV
3.0%

Utilities

MGV
2.0%
VTV
4.8%

Real Estate

MGV
1.0%
VTV
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGV vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MGV
MGV Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
MGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGV Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
MGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MGV vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGVVTVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.47

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.31

4.24

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.78

16.42

+0.36

MGV vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGV Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGV and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGV vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGV drawdown since its inception was -56.07%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGV and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGVVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.07%

-59.27%

+3.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.42%

-6.35%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.18%

-14.52%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.54%

-17.04%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.41%

-36.78%

+1.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-1.36%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.73%

-7.82%

+0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

1.64%

+0.01%

Volatility

MGV vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) has a higher volatility of 2.87% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.62%. This indicates that MGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGVVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

2.62%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.85%

7.72%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.31%

10.36%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.56%

13.82%

-0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.30%

16.61%

-0.31%

MGV vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MGV vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

MGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, which matches VTV's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
1.87%2.04%2.31%2.48%2.45%2.17%2.47%2.69%2.65%2.34%2.53%2.59%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.86%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, MGV and VTV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MGV has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to VTV (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGV dropped -56.07% vs VTV's -59.27%.

On 10-year performance, MGV leads with 12.87% vs 12.57% for VTV. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MGV has performed better with a 12.87% return vs 12.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for MGV.

MGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.86% for VTV.

MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGV and 0.04% for VTV.

MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGV and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer