ONEY vs. IMCV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ONEY (SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF) and IMCV (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - ONEY tracks the Russell 1000 Yield Focused Factor Index while IMCV tracks the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ONEY returned 12.04%/yr vs 10.40%/yr for IMCV. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ONEY charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IMCV.

Performance

ONEY vs. IMCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEY achieves a 14.26% return, which is significantly higher than IMCV's 9.96% return. Over the past 10 years, ONEY has outperformed IMCV with an annualized return of 12.04%, while IMCV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.40% annualized return.

ONEY

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 3.52%
• YTD: 14.26%
• 6M: 14.38%
• 1Y: 23.42%
• 3Y*: 15.65%
• 5Y*: 8.74%
• 10Y*: 12.04%

IMCV

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 2.12%
• YTD: 9.96%
• 6M: 11.32%
• 1Y: 23.41%
• 3Y*: 16.66%
• 5Y*: 8.69%
• 10Y*: 10.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEY vs. IMCV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ONEY SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF	14.26%	7.74%	11.63%	11.12%	-3.60%	37.11%	2.17%	27.45%	-8.71%	15.46%
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF	9.96%	13.52%	12.28%	11.89%	-6.98%	33.56%	-4.11%	24.72%	-10.93%	12.60%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEY and IMCV is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2015	0.86

The correlation between ONEY and IMCV shifts across timeframes, from 0.86 (all time) to 0.96 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ONEY vs. IMCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ONEY	IMCV
Industrials	13.9%	12.1%
Energy	13.2%	12.5%
Consumer Defensive	12.2%	8.9%
Consumer Cyclical	11.8%	8.7%
Utilities	10.6%	10.0%
Financial Services	10.2%	15.6%
Real Estate	9.7%	5.6%
Basic Materials	8.2%	6.5%
Technology	4.8%	9.1%
Healthcare	3.8%	8.5%
Communication Services	1.6%	2.5%

Return for Risk

ONEY vs. IMCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEY

ONEY Risk / Return Rank: 58
ONEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
ONEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
ONEY Omega Ratio Rank: 54
ONEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
ONEY Martin Ratio Rank: 62

IMCV

IMCV Risk / Return Rank: 63
IMCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
IMCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
IMCV Omega Ratio Rank: 58
IMCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
IMCV Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEY vs. IMCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ONEY	IMCV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	2.02	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	2.94	-0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.36	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.09	3.41	-0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.15	12.72	-1.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ONEY vs. IMCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEY Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the IMCV Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEY and IMCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ONEY	IMCV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.90	2.02	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.53	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	0.53	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.47	+0.14

Drawdowns

ONEY vs. IMCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEY drawdown since its inception was -46.80%, smaller than the maximum IMCV drawdown of -64.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEY and IMCV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ONEY	IMCV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.80%	-64.74%	+17.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.61%	-6.90%	-0.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.50%	-18.63%	+1.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.93%	-19.87%	+0.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.80%	-46.33%	-0.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.18%	-0.21%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.98%	-8.42%	+3.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.11%	1.85%	+0.26%

Volatility

ONEY vs. IMCV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) has a higher volatility of 2.78% compared to iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) at 2.56%. This indicates that ONEY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ONEY	IMCV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.78%	2.56%	+0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.42%	8.00%	+0.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.39%	11.63%	+0.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.15%	16.63%	-0.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.87%	19.66%	+0.21%

ONEY vs. IMCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEY has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCV's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ONEY vs. IMCV - Dividend Comparison

ONEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than IMCV's 1.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF	1.94%	2.23%	2.36%	2.30%	2.36%	1.86%	2.61%	2.45%	2.61%	1.87%	2.09%	2.29%
ONEY SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF	2.81%	3.15%	3.18%	3.14%	3.17%	2.46%	2.74%	3.17%	3.72%	10.73%	6.31%	0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ONEY and IMCV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, ONEY and IMCV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ONEY or IMCV?

ONEY has higher volatility (2.78%) compared to IMCV (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEY dropped -46.80% vs IMCV's -64.74%.

Which ETF is better, ONEY or IMCV?

On 10-year performance, ONEY leads with 12.04% vs 10.40% for IMCV. On fees, IMCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IMCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ONEY or IMCV?

Over the 10-year period, ONEY has performed better with a 12.04% return vs 10.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ONEY or IMCV?

IMCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ONEY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ONEY or IMCV?

ONEY has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 1.94% for IMCV.

What is the main difference between ONEY and IMCV?

ONEY tracks Russell 1000 Yield Focused Factor Index, while IMCV tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEY and 0.06% for IMCV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IMCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.