PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONEY vs. ONEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ONEY vs. ONEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) and SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEY achieves a 14.15% return, which is significantly lower than ONEO's 17.34% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ONEY having a 12.19% annualized return and ONEO not far behind at 12.17%.


ONEY

1D
0.24%
1M
1.02%
YTD
14.15%
6M
13.74%
1Y
22.55%
3Y*
15.30%
5Y*
9.56%
10Y*
12.19%

ONEO

1D
-1.24%
1M
2.82%
YTD
17.34%
6M
15.90%
1Y
26.28%
3Y*
18.57%
5Y*
10.59%
10Y*
12.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEY vs. ONEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ONEY
SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF
14.15%7.74%11.63%11.12%-3.60%37.11%2.17%27.45%-8.71%15.46%
ONEO
SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF
17.34%10.61%15.01%15.64%-12.01%26.72%10.76%26.53%-12.41%21.16%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEY and ONEO is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015

0.81

The correlation between ONEY and ONEO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

ONEY vs. ONEO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ONEY
ONEO

Industrials

13.6%
17.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.5%
11.3%

Energy

12.2%
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

12.0%
5.0%

Utilities

10.2%
5.4%

Financial Services

9.9%
8.8%

Real Estate

9.7%
2.8%

Basic Materials

8.2%
4.7%

Technology

6.1%
25.6%

Healthcare

4.2%
9.4%

Communication Services

1.6%
3.5%

Industrials

ONEY
13.6%
ONEO
17.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ONEY
12.5%
ONEO
11.3%

Energy

ONEY
12.2%
ONEO
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

ONEY
12.0%
ONEO
5.0%

Utilities

ONEY
10.2%
ONEO
5.4%

Financial Services

ONEY
9.9%
ONEO
8.8%

Real Estate

ONEY
9.7%
ONEO
2.8%

Basic Materials

ONEY
8.2%
ONEO
4.7%

Technology

ONEY
6.1%
ONEO
25.6%

Healthcare

ONEY
4.2%
ONEO
9.4%

Communication Services

ONEY
1.6%
ONEO
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ONEY vs. ONEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEY
ONEY Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
ONEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEY Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEY Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

ONEO
ONEO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ONEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEY vs. ONEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) and SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ONEYONEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.35

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

3.58

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.64

14.03

-3.40

ONEY vs. ONEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEY Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the ONEO Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEY and ONEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ONEY vs. ONEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEY drawdown since its inception was -46.80%, which is greater than ONEO's maximum drawdown of -40.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEY and ONEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONEYONEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.80%

-40.86%

-5.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.61%

-7.37%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.50%

-19.72%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.93%

-22.39%

+3.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.80%

-40.86%

-5.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.18%

-1.40%

-0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

-4.98%

+0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

1.88%

+0.25%

Volatility

ONEY vs. ONEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) is 3.50%, while SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) has a volatility of 4.97%. This indicates that ONEY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONEYONEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

4.97%

-1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.63%

10.45%

-1.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.57%

13.39%

-0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.06%

17.29%

-1.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.88%

18.69%

+1.19%

ONEY vs. ONEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ONEY and ONEO have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ONEY vs. ONEO - Dividend Comparison

ONEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, more than ONEO's 1.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ONEO
SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF
1.20%1.29%1.30%1.56%1.73%1.19%1.28%1.64%1.72%7.69%1.82%0.17%
ONEY
SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF
2.88%3.15%3.18%3.14%3.17%2.46%2.74%3.17%3.72%10.73%6.31%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


ONEY and ONEO have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ONEO has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to ONEY (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEY dropped -46.80% vs ONEO's -40.86%.

On 10-year performance, ONEY leads with 12.19% vs 12.17% for ONEO. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, ONEY has been the lower-risk option at 3.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ONEY has performed better with a 12.19% return vs 12.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ONEY and ONEO have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

ONEY has the higher dividend yield at 2.88%, compared with 1.20% for ONEO.

ONEY is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while ONEO is Momentum. ONEY tracks Russell 1000 Yield Focused Factor Index, while ONEO tracks Russell 1000 Momentum Focused Factor Index.

ONEO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONEY and ONEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer