PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONEY vs. ONEV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ONEY vs. ONEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) and SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEY achieves a 18.71% return, which is significantly higher than ONEV's 12.64% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ONEY having a 11.90% annualized return and ONEV not far behind at 11.34%.


ONEY

1D
-1.35%
1M
3.71%
6M
12.72%
YTD
18.71%
1Y
23.89%
3Y*
13.29%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
11.90%
ALL TIME*
12.33%

ONEV

1D
-1.38%
1M
3.84%
6M
9.28%
YTD
12.64%
1Y
16.65%
3Y*
12.11%
5Y*
8.92%
10Y*
11.34%
ALL TIME*
11.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.32M$3.32M$4.49M
$6.57M$5.38M$5.21M

ONEY vs. ONEV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ONEY
SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF
18.71%7.74%11.63%11.12%-3.60%37.11%2.17%27.45%-8.71%15.46%
ONEV
SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF
12.64%8.14%11.76%13.28%-8.15%29.19%6.66%30.66%-5.30%18.11%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEY and ONEV is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015

0.85

The correlation between ONEY and ONEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

ONEY vs. ONEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ONEY
ONEV

Financial Services

17.8%
17.0%

Consumer Defensive

11.5%
9.1%

Real Estate

11.3%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
11.3%

Utilities

10.6%
8.2%

Industrials

9.9%
17.7%

Energy

7.9%
2.3%

Technology

6.6%
8.3%

Healthcare

5.0%
12.3%

Basic Materials

4.5%
2.7%

Communication Services

3.4%
2.7%

Financial Services

ONEY
17.8%
ONEV
17.0%

Consumer Defensive

ONEY
11.5%
ONEV
9.1%

Real Estate

ONEY
11.3%
ONEV
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ONEY
11.0%
ONEV
11.3%

Utilities

ONEY
10.6%
ONEV
8.2%

Industrials

ONEY
9.9%
ONEV
17.7%

Energy

ONEY
7.9%
ONEV
2.3%

Technology

ONEY
6.6%
ONEV
8.3%

Healthcare

ONEY
5.0%
ONEV
12.3%

Basic Materials

ONEY
4.5%
ONEV
2.7%

Communication Services

ONEY
3.4%
ONEV
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ONEY vs. ONEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ONEY
ONEY Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ONEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEY Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEY Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

ONEV
ONEV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ONEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEV Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEV Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ONEY vs. ONEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) and SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ONEYONEVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.25

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

2.16

+1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.73

7.47

+4.25

ONEY vs. ONEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEY Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the ONEV Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEY and ONEV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ONEY vs. ONEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEY drawdown since its inception was -46.80%, which is greater than ONEV's maximum drawdown of -39.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEY and ONEV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONEYONEVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.80%

-39.72%

-7.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.61%

-7.75%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.50%

-14.81%

-2.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.93%

-18.52%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.80%

-39.72%

-7.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.52%

-1.77%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.93%

-3.85%

-1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

2.23%

-0.18%

Volatility

ONEY vs. ONEV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) and SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) have volatilities of 4.40% and 4.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONEYONEVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

4.54%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.86%

8.47%

+0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.52%

11.55%

+0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.06%

14.60%

+1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.81%

17.03%

+2.78%

ONEY vs. ONEV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ONEY and ONEV have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ONEY vs. ONEV - Dividend Comparison

ONEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, more than ONEV's 1.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ONEV
SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF
1.79%1.81%1.88%1.79%1.80%1.44%1.87%2.07%2.14%6.91%3.73%0.21%
ONEY
SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF
2.77%3.15%3.18%3.14%3.17%2.46%2.74%3.17%3.72%10.73%6.31%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, ONEY and ONEV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ONEV has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to ONEY (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEY dropped -46.80% vs ONEV's -39.72%.

On 10-year performance, ONEY leads with 11.90% vs 11.34% for ONEV. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, ONEY has been the lower-risk option at 4.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ONEY has performed better with a 11.90% return vs 11.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ONEY and ONEV have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

ONEY has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 1.79% for ONEV.

ONEY is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while ONEV is Low Volatility. ONEY tracks Russell 1000 Yield Focused Factor Index, while ONEV tracks Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focused Factor (TR).

ONEY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONEY and ONEV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer