ONEY vs. FSPGX

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

ONEY (SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF) and FSPGX (Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund) are both funds - ONEY is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Yield Focused Factor Index, while FSPGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, ONEY returned 10.17%/yr vs 14.30%/yr for FSPGX. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ONEY charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FSPGX.

Performance

ONEY vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEY achieves a 13.49% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's 4.50% return.

ONEY

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 1.86%
• YTD: 13.49%
• 6M: 13.10%
• 1Y: 22.84%
• 3Y*: 13.93%
• 5Y*: 10.17%
• 10Y*: 11.98%

FSPGX

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: -1.00%
• YTD: 4.50%
• 6M: 4.43%
• 1Y: 22.12%
• 3Y*: 22.67%
• 5Y*: 14.30%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEY vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ONEY SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF	13.49%	7.74%	11.63%	11.12%	-3.60%	37.11%	2.17%	27.45%	-8.71%	15.46%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	4.50%	18.54%	33.27%	42.77%	-29.17%	27.57%	38.46%	36.38%	-1.79%	27.70%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEY and FSPGX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between ONEY and FSPGX has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

ONEY vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEY

ONEY Risk / Return Rank: 59
ONEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
ONEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
ONEY Omega Ratio Rank: 54
ONEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
ONEY Martin Ratio Rank: 63

FSPGX

FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 24
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEY vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ONEY	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	1.38	+0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	1.90	+0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.24	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.02	1.37	+1.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.82	4.51	+6.31

ONEY vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEY Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEY and FSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ONEY vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEY drawdown since its inception was -46.80%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEY and FSPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ONEY	FSPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.80%	-32.66%	-14.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.61%	-16.17%	+8.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.50%	-23.32%	+5.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.93%	-32.66%	+13.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.75%	-4.14%	+1.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.97%	-6.36%	+1.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.12%	4.91%	-2.79%

Volatility

ONEY vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) is 3.54%, while Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) has a volatility of 5.97%. This indicates that ONEY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ONEY	FSPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.54%	5.97%	-2.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.64%	12.68%	-4.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.57%	16.13%	-3.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.10%	21.60%	-5.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.87%	21.56%	-1.69%

ONEY vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEY has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ONEY vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

ONEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than FSPGX's 0.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	0.33%	0.34%	0.37%	0.73%	0.86%	2.22%	1.76%	1.04%	1.32%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%
ONEY SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF	2.83%	3.15%	3.18%	3.14%	3.17%	2.46%	2.74%	3.17%	3.72%	10.73%	6.31%	0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ONEY and FSPGX in my portfolio?

ONEY and FSPGX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ONEY or FSPGX?

FSPGX has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to ONEY (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEY dropped -46.80% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ONEY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.