ONEY vs. RFV
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV).
ONEY and RFV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ONEY is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Yield Focused Factor (TR). It was launched on Dec 2, 2015. RFV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value. It was launched on Mar 1, 2006. Both ONEY and RFV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ONEY or RFV.
Key characteristics
| ONEY | RFV | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 3.35% | -4.94% |
| 1Y Return | 13.58% | 19.84% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 6.62% | 7.51% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.43% | 12.15% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.51% | 20.10% |
| Max Drawdown | -46.80% | -71.82% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.91% | -7.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between ONEY and RFV is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ONEY vs. RFV - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ONEY achieves a 3.35% return, which is significantly higher than RFV's -4.94% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ONEY vs. RFV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ONEY has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than RFV's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ONEY vs. RFV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ONEY vs. RFV - Dividend Comparison
ONEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, more than RFV's 1.31% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ONEY SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF | 3.11% | 3.14% | 3.17% | 2.46% | 2.74% | 3.17% | 3.72% | 10.73% | 3.19% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF | 1.31% | 1.27% | 2.05% | 1.60% | 1.52% | 1.71% | 1.39% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 1.79% | 1.19% | 0.80% |
Drawdowns
ONEY vs. RFV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ONEY drawdown since its inception was -46.80%, smaller than the maximum RFV drawdown of -71.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEY and RFV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ONEY vs. RFV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) is 3.71%, while Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) has a volatility of 4.96%. This indicates that ONEY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.