ONEY vs. RFV

Last updated Jul 31, 2026

ONEY (SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF) and RFV (Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ONEY is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Yield Focused Factor Index, while RFV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ONEY returned 11.90%/yr vs 12.58%/yr for RFV. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ONEY charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RFV.

Performance

ONEY vs. RFV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ONEY having a 18.71% return and RFV slightly higher at 19.11%. Over the past 10 years, ONEY has underperformed RFV with an annualized return of 11.90%, while RFV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.58% annualized return.

ONEY

• 1D: -1.35%
• 1M: 3.71%
• 6M: 12.72%
• YTD: 18.71%
• 1Y: 23.89%
• 3Y*: 13.29%
• 5Y*: 10.34%
• 10Y*: 11.90%
• ALL TIME*: 12.33%

RFV

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 5.54%
• 6M: 13.42%
• YTD: 19.11%
• 1Y: 23.03%
• 3Y*: 13.33%
• 5Y*: 12.38%
• 10Y*: 12.58%
• ALL TIME*: 10.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ONEY SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF	$6.57M	$5.38M	$5.21M
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF	$888.35K	$981.36K	$747.86K

ONEY vs. RFV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ONEY SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF	18.71%	7.74%	11.63%	11.12%	-3.60%	37.11%	2.17%	27.45%	-8.71%	15.46%
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF	19.11%	7.66%	5.63%	30.26%	-3.99%	33.02%	9.61%	24.98%	-18.56%	14.74%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEY and RFV is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015	0.81

The correlation between ONEY and RFV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

ONEY vs. RFV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ONEY	RFV
Financial Services	17.8%	18.6%
Consumer Defensive	11.5%	6.6%
Real Estate	11.3%	4.0%
Consumer Cyclical	11.0%	25.1%
Utilities	10.6%	-
Industrials	9.9%	11.1%
Energy	7.9%	13.9%
Technology	6.6%	11.6%
Healthcare	5.0%	0.7%
Basic Materials	4.5%	6.4%
Communication Services	3.4%	1.8%

Return for Risk

ONEY vs. RFV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ONEY

ONEY Risk / Return Rank: 85
ONEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
ONEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
ONEY Omega Ratio Rank: 82
ONEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
ONEY Martin Ratio Rank: 86

RFV

RFV Risk / Return Rank: 57
RFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
RFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
RFV Omega Ratio Rank: 57
RFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
RFV Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ONEY vs. RFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ONEY	RFV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	1.36	+0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	2.06	+0.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.24	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.15	1.85	+1.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.73	5.86	+5.87

ONEY vs. RFV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEY Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the RFV Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEY and RFV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ONEY vs. RFV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEY drawdown since its inception was -46.80%, smaller than the maximum RFV drawdown of -71.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEY and RFV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ONEY	RFV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.80%	-71.82%	+25.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.61%	-12.51%	+4.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.50%	-24.65%	+7.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.93%	-24.65%	+5.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.80%	-52.24%	+5.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.52%	0.00%	-1.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.93%	-9.73%	+4.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.05%	3.98%	-1.93%

Volatility

ONEY vs. RFV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) has a higher volatility of 4.40% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) at 3.04%. This indicates that ONEY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ONEY	RFV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.40%	3.04%	+1.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.86%	11.14%	-2.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.52%	17.19%	-4.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.06%	21.78%	-5.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.81%	24.84%	-5.03%

ONEY vs. RFV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEY has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than RFV's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

ONEY vs. RFV - Dividend Comparison

ONEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, more than RFV's 1.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ONEY SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF	2.77%	3.15%	3.18%	3.14%	3.17%	2.46%	2.74%	3.17%	3.72%	10.73%	6.31%	0.29%
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF	1.60%	2.07%	1.31%	1.27%	2.05%	1.60%	1.52%	1.71%	1.39%	1.36%	0.88%	1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ONEY and RFV in my portfolio?

ONEY and RFV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ONEY or RFV?

ONEY has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to RFV (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEY dropped -46.80% vs RFV's -71.82%.

Which ETF is better, ONEY or RFV?

On 10-year performance, RFV leads with 12.58% vs 11.90% for ONEY. On fees, ONEY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RFV has been the lower-risk option at 3.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ONEY or RFV?

Over the 10-year period, RFV has performed better with a 12.58% return vs 11.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ONEY or RFV?

ONEY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RFV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ONEY or RFV?

ONEY has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 1.60% for RFV.

What is the main difference between ONEY and RFV?

ONEY is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while RFV is Small Cap Value Equities. ONEY tracks Russell 1000 Yield Focused Factor Index, while RFV tracks S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEY and 0.35% for RFV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ONEY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.