OND vs. NOBL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

OND (ProShares On-Demand ETF) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OND is a Communications Equities fund tracking the FactSet On-Demand Index, while NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, OND returned 13.96%/yr vs 8.50%/yr for NOBL. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OND charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.

Performance

OND vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OND achieves a -18.87% return, which is significantly lower than NOBL's 6.48% return.

OND

• 1D: -2.16%
• 1M: -5.24%
• YTD: -18.87%
• 6M: -19.28%
• 1Y: -17.46%
• 3Y*: 13.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NOBL

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 2.27%
• YTD: 6.48%
• 6M: 5.98%
• 1Y: 12.52%
• 3Y*: 8.50%
• 5Y*: 6.18%
• 10Y*: 9.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OND vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
OND ProShares On-Demand ETF	-18.87%	26.72%	32.00%	27.03%	-41.93%	-15.04%
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	6.48%	6.84%	6.72%	8.09%	-6.52%	5.47%

Correlation

The correlation between OND and NOBL is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2021	0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between OND and NOBL has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

OND vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OND	NOBL
Technology	25.9%	4.6%
Communication Services	23.8%	-
Industrials	3.6%	20.2%
Real Estate	3.1%	4.6%
Consumer Cyclical	1.8%	5.3%
Basic Materials	-	10.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	23.6%
Energy	-	2.9%
Financial Services	-	12.8%
Healthcare	-	10.2%
Utilities	-	5.7%

Return for Risk

OND vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OND

OND Risk / Return Rank: 3
OND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
OND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
OND Omega Ratio Rank: 3
OND Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
OND Martin Ratio Rank: 5

NOBL

NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 29
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 28
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OND vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OND	NOBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.84	1.10	-1.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.10	1.67	-2.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	1.19	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.52	1.38	-1.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.92	3.50	-4.42

OND vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OND Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is lower than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OND and NOBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OND vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OND drawdown since its inception was -59.02%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OND and NOBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	OND	NOBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.02%	-35.43%	-23.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.80%	-9.11%	-24.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.80%	-15.36%	-18.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.92%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.63%	-3.29%	-28.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.29%	-3.48%	-26.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.06%	3.58%	+15.48%

Volatility

OND vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) has a higher volatility of 6.52% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 3.31%. This indicates that OND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OND	NOBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.52%	3.31%	+3.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.83%	8.22%	+7.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.91%	11.52%	+9.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.10%	14.38%	+12.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.10%	16.60%	+10.50%

OND vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

OND has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

OND vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

OND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	2.06%	2.14%	2.05%	2.09%	1.94%	1.89%	2.14%	1.89%	2.37%	1.74%	2.13%	2.02%
OND ProShares On-Demand ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.78%	0.00%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OND and NOBL in my portfolio?

OND and NOBL have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OND or NOBL?

OND has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to NOBL (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OND dropped -59.02% vs NOBL's -35.43%.

Which ETF is better, OND or NOBL?

On 3-year performance, OND leads with 13.96% vs 8.50% for NOBL. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OND or NOBL?

Over the 3-year period, OND has performed better with a 13.96% return vs 8.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OND or NOBL?

NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for OND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OND or NOBL?

NOBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 0.00% for OND.

What is the main difference between OND and NOBL?

OND is categorized as Communications Equities, while NOBL is Dividend. OND tracks FactSet On-Demand Index, while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for OND and 0.35% for NOBL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NOBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.