OND vs. CQQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ).
OND and CQQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. OND is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the FactSet On-Demand Index. It was launched on Oct 26, 2021. CQQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the AlphaShares China Technology Index. It was launched on Dec 8, 2009. Both OND and CQQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
OND vs. CQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OND vs. CQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OND ProShares On-Demand ETF | -18.86% | 26.72% | 32.00% | 27.03% | -41.93% | -14.36% |
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF | -11.50% | 34.96% | 9.84% | -16.71% | -30.09% | -10.11% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OND achieves a -18.86% return, which is significantly lower than CQQQ's -11.50% return.
OND
- 1D
- 3.29%
- 1M
- -8.40%
- YTD
- -18.86%
- 6M
- -30.71%
- 1Y
- 1.35%
- 3Y*
- 15.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CQQQ
- 1D
- 2.91%
- 1M
- -11.62%
- YTD
- -11.50%
- 6M
- -20.29%
- 1Y
- 6.15%
- 3Y*
- 0.59%
- 5Y*
- -10.73%
- 10Y*
- 3.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OND vs. CQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
OND has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than CQQQ's 0.70% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
OND vs. CQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
OND
CQQQ
OND vs. CQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OND | CQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.06 | 0.19 | -0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.24 | 0.51 | -0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.06 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.01 | 0.23 | -0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.04 | 0.63 | -0.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OND | CQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 | 0.19 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.13 | 0.16 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between OND and CQQQ is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
OND vs. CQQQ - Dividend Comparison
OND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OND ProShares On-Demand ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF | 2.45% | 2.17% | 0.28% | 0.55% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 0.01% | 0.43% | 1.41% | 1.69% | 1.77% |
Drawdowns
OND vs. CQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OND drawdown since its inception was -59.02%, smaller than the maximum CQQQ drawdown of -73.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OND and CQQQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OND | CQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.02% | -73.99% | +14.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.80% | -24.41% | -9.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -67.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.63% | -56.10% | +24.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.39% | -28.04% | -2.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.36% | 8.99% | +4.37% |
Volatility
OND vs. CQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) is 7.13%, while Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) has a volatility of 10.60%. This indicates that OND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OND | CQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.13% | 10.60% | -3.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.54% | 20.75% | -5.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.58% | 31.95% | -9.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.37% | 37.72% | -10.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.37% | 33.06% | -5.69% |