OND vs. ARKW
OND (ProShares On-Demand ETF) and ARKW (ARK Next Generation Internet ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OND is a Communications Equities fund tracking the FactSet On-Demand Index, while ARKW is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by ARK. OND is passively managed, while ARKW is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, OND returned 11.90%/yr vs 27.92%/yr for ARKW. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. OND charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for ARKW.
Performance
OND vs. ARKW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OND achieves a -15.89% return, which is significantly lower than ARKW's -7.37% return.
OND
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- 6M
- -11.55%
- YTD
- -15.89%
- 1Y
- -17.52%
- 3Y*
- 11.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -2.61%
ARKW
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -5.74%
- 6M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- -7.37%
- 1Y
- -7.47%
- 3Y*
- 27.92%
- 5Y*
- -1.16%
- 10Y*
- 21.15%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.60M | $12.21M | $13.95M | |
| $3.36K | $4.57K | $11.88K |
OND vs. ARKW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OND ProShares On-Demand ETF | -15.89% | 26.72% | 32.00% | 27.03% | -41.93% | -15.04% |
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | -7.37% | 38.93% | 42.27% | 96.89% | -67.49% | -24.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between OND and ARKW is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2021 | 0.79 |
The correlation between OND and ARKW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
OND vs. ARKW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OND
ARKW
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
OND
ARKW
Technology
OND
ARKW
Consumer Cyclical
OND
ARKW
Industrials
OND
ARKW
Real Estate
OND
ARKW
-
Basic Materials
OND
-
ARKW
-
Consumer Defensive
OND
-
ARKW
-
Energy
OND
-
ARKW
-
Financial Services
OND
-
ARKW
Healthcare
OND
-
ARKW
-
Utilities
OND
-
ARKW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OND vs. ARKW — Risk / Return Rank
OND
ARKW
OND vs. ARKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) and ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OND | ARKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 0.97 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | -0.33 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | -0.62 | -0.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OND vs. ARKW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OND drawdown since its inception was -59.02%, smaller than the maximum ARKW drawdown of -80.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OND and ARKW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OND | ARKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.02% | -80.52% | +21.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.80% | -36.21% | +2.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.80% | -36.21% | +2.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -77.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.12% | -25.76% | -3.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.27% | -23.95% | -6.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.38% | 19.34% | +2.04% |
Volatility
OND vs. ARKW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) is 5.56%, while ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) has a volatility of 8.84%. This indicates that OND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OND | ARKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.56% | 8.84% | -3.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.70% | 25.86% | -9.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.12% | 33.57% | -12.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.97% | 43.76% | -16.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.97% | 37.82% | -10.85% |
OND vs. ARKW - Expense Ratio Comparison
OND has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKW's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
OND vs. ARKW - Dividend Comparison
OND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | 1.72% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 13.05% | 2.05% | 0.00% | 2.29% |
OND ProShares On-Demand ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OND and ARKW have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARKW has higher volatility (8.84%) compared to OND (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OND dropped -59.02% vs ARKW's -80.52%.
On 3-year performance, ARKW leads with 27.92% vs 11.90% for OND. On fees, OND is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, OND has been the lower-risk option at 5.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ARKW has performed better with a 27.92% return vs 11.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OND is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ARKW.
ARKW has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 0.00% for OND.
OND is categorized as Communications Equities, while ARKW is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for OND and 0.76% for ARKW.
ARKW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.36 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OND and ARKW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer