PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OND vs. PRGTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OND vs. PRGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) and T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OND achieves a -15.89% return, which is significantly lower than PRGTX's 23.62% return.


OND

1D
-1.16%
1M
-1.00%
6M
-11.55%
YTD
-15.89%
1Y
-17.52%
3Y*
11.90%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-2.61%

PRGTX

1D
5.19%
1M
-5.99%
6M
20.57%
YTD
23.62%
1Y
40.50%
3Y*
30.64%
5Y*
6.46%
10Y*
17.34%
ALL TIME*
11.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.36K$4.57K$11.88K
$0.00$0.00$0.00

OND vs. PRGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
-15.89%26.72%32.00%27.03%-41.93%-15.04%
PRGTX
T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund
23.62%27.28%33.12%55.92%-55.53%-12.25%

Correlation

The correlation between OND and PRGTX is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2021

0.77

The correlation between OND and PRGTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OND vs. PRGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OND
OND Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
OND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OND Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
OND Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
OND Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
OND Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

PRGTX
PRGTX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
PRGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PRGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OND vs. PRGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) and T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ONDPRGTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.23

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.55

1.99

-2.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.86

6.74

-7.60

OND vs. PRGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OND Sharpe Ratio is -0.88, which is lower than the PRGTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OND and PRGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OND vs. PRGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OND drawdown since its inception was -59.02%, smaller than the maximum PRGTX drawdown of -71.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OND and PRGTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONDPRGTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.02%

-71.18%

+12.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.80%

-18.50%

-15.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.80%

-26.67%

-7.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.12%

-14.26%

-14.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.27%

-21.45%

-8.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.38%

5.45%

+15.93%

Volatility

OND vs. PRGTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) is 5.56%, while T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) has a volatility of 11.71%. This indicates that OND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONDPRGTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.56%

11.71%

-6.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.70%

25.46%

-8.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.12%

29.02%

-7.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.97%

32.66%

-5.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.97%

28.83%

-1.86%

OND vs. PRGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OND has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than PRGTX's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

OND vs. PRGTX - Dividend Comparison

Neither OND nor PRGTX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.78%0.00%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRGTX
T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.28%27.71%5.05%0.15%24.67%15.81%9.46%10.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


OND and PRGTX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRGTX has higher volatility (11.71%) compared to OND (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OND dropped -59.02% vs PRGTX's -71.18%.

PRGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OND and PRGTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer