MGV vs. VUG
MGV (Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MGV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index, while VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MGV returned 12.84%/yr vs 18.25%/yr for VUG. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MGV charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
MGV vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGV achieves a 14.01% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 9.78% return. Over the past 10 years, MGV has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 12.84%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.25% annualized return.
MGV
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- 14.01%
- 6M
- 14.90%
- 1Y
- 28.63%
- 3Y*
- 19.33%
- 5Y*
- 12.10%
- 10Y*
- 12.84%
VUG
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 5.75%
- YTD
- 9.78%
- 6M
- 8.99%
- 1Y
- 27.72%
- 3Y*
- 26.10%
- 5Y*
- 15.17%
- 10Y*
- 18.25%
MGV vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 14.01% | 15.45% | 16.94% | 9.16% | -1.22% | 25.93% | 2.50% | 25.54% | -4.13% | 16.85% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 9.78% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 37.03% | -3.32% | 27.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGV and VUG is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2007 | 0.75 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MGV and VUG has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
MGV vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MGV
VUG
Financial Services
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
MGV
VUG
Healthcare
MGV
VUG
Technology
MGV
VUG
Industrials
MGV
VUG
Consumer Defensive
MGV
VUG
Energy
MGV
VUG
Consumer Cyclical
MGV
VUG
Communication Services
MGV
VUG
Utilities
MGV
VUG
Basic Materials
MGV
VUG
Real Estate
MGV
VUG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGV vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
MGV
VUG
MGV vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGV | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.31 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.48 | 1.68 | +2.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.05 | 5.90 | +11.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGV | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.93 | 1.76 | +1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.69 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | 0.85 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.62 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
MGV vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGV drawdown since its inception was -55.87%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGV and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGV | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.87% | -50.68% | -5.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.42% | -16.53% | +10.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.18% | -22.85% | +9.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.54% | -35.61% | +19.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.41% | -35.61% | +0.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.25% | +1.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.69% | -7.09% | -0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 4.71% | -3.03% |
Volatility
MGV vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) is 2.37%, while Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that MGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGV | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.37% | 3.81% | -1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.49% | 12.11% | -4.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.85% | 15.83% | -5.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.57% | 22.21% | -8.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 21.44% | -5.11% |
MGV vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MGV vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
MGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than VUG's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 1.87% | 2.04% | 2.31% | 2.48% | 2.45% | 2.17% | 2.47% | 2.69% | 2.65% | 2.34% | 2.53% | 2.59% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGV and VUG have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VUG has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to MGV (2.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGV dropped -55.87% vs VUG's -50.68%.
On 10-year performance, VUG leads with 18.25% vs 12.84% for MGV. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, MGV has been the lower-risk option at 2.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VUG has performed better with a 18.25% return vs 12.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for MGV.
MGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 0.37% for VUG.
MGV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGV and 0.03% for VUG.
MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGV and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer