VUG vs. SCHG
VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - VUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index while SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VUG returned 17.90%/yr vs 18.50%/yr for SCHG. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VUG charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
VUG vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VUG achieves a 4.99% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 2.58% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VUG having a 17.90% annualized return and SCHG not far ahead at 18.50%.
VUG
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -3.64%
- YTD
- 4.99%
- 6M
- 5.66%
- 1Y
- 22.83%
- 3Y*
- 23.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.78%
- 10Y*
- 17.90%
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -3.66%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- 1Y
- 20.32%
- 3Y*
- 22.68%
- 5Y*
- 14.33%
- 10Y*
- 18.50%
VUG vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 4.99% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 37.03% | -3.32% | 27.72% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 2.58% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUG and SCHG is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009 | 0.99 |
The correlation between VUG and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
VUG vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VUG
SCHG
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
VUG
SCHG
Communication Services
VUG
SCHG
Consumer Cyclical
VUG
SCHG
Healthcare
VUG
SCHG
Financial Services
VUG
SCHG
Industrials
VUG
SCHG
Consumer Defensive
VUG
SCHG
Real Estate
VUG
SCHG
Utilities
VUG
SCHG
Basic Materials
VUG
SCHG
Energy
VUG
SCHG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VUG vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
VUG
SCHG
VUG vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VUG | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.21 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 1.14 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.43 | 3.78 | +0.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VUG vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUG drawdown since its inception was -50.68%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUG and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VUG | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.68% | -34.59% | -16.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.53% | -16.41% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.85% | -23.39% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.61% | -34.59% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.61% | -34.59% | -1.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.56% | -5.33% | -0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.09% | -5.20% | -1.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.79% | 4.96% | -0.17% |
Volatility
VUG vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.14%. This indicates that VUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VUG | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.73% | 5.14% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.00% | 12.30% | +0.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.46% | 15.95% | +0.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.30% | 22.33% | -0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 21.58% | -0.10% |
VUG vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VUG vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, VUG and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VUG has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to SCHG (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VUG dropped -50.68% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.50% vs 17.90% for VUG. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.50% return vs 17.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for SCHG.
VUG and SCHG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.39%.
VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VUG and 0.04% for SCHG.
VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VUG and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer