PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUG vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUG vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUG achieves a 9.78% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.34% return. Over the past 10 years, VUG has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 18.25%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.55% annualized return.


VUG

1D
0.26%
1M
5.75%
YTD
9.78%
6M
8.99%
1Y
27.72%
3Y*
26.10%
5Y*
15.17%
10Y*
18.25%

VOO

1D
0.39%
1M
4.62%
YTD
11.34%
6M
11.27%
1Y
28.62%
3Y*
22.68%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*
15.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUG vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
9.78%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.34%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between VUG and VOO is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.94

The correlation between VUG and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

VUG vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VUG
VOO

Technology

53.5%
35.7%

Communication Services

17.3%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
10.2%

Healthcare

4.6%
8.5%

Financial Services

4.3%
11.6%

Industrials

3.6%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

1.5%
4.9%

Real Estate

1.0%
1.9%

Utilities

0.9%
2.4%

Basic Materials

0.6%
1.8%

Energy

0.4%
3.5%

Technology

VUG
53.5%
VOO
35.7%

Communication Services

VUG
17.3%
VOO
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VUG
12.2%
VOO
10.2%

Healthcare

VUG
4.6%
VOO
8.5%

Financial Services

VUG
4.3%
VOO
11.6%

Industrials

VUG
3.6%
VOO
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

VUG
1.5%
VOO
4.9%

Real Estate

VUG
1.0%
VOO
1.9%

Utilities

VUG
0.9%
VOO
2.4%

Basic Materials

VUG
0.6%
VOO
1.8%

Energy

VUG
0.4%
VOO
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUG vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUG vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VUGVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.44

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

3.23

-1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.90

15.03

-9.14

VUG vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUG and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VUGVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

2.44

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.84

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.87

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.89

-0.27

Drawdowns

VUG vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUG drawdown since its inception was -50.68%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUG and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUGVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.68%

-33.99%

-16.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.53%

-8.90%

-7.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.85%

-18.69%

-4.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.61%

-24.52%

-11.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.61%

-33.99%

-1.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-0.32%

-0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.09%

-3.69%

-3.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.71%

1.91%

+2.80%

Volatility

VUG vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.78%. This indicates that VUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUGVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

2.78%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.11%

8.90%

+3.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.83%

11.80%

+4.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.21%

16.81%

+5.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.44%

18.00%

+3.44%

VUG vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VUG and VOO have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VUG vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.37%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, VUG and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VUG has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to VOO (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VUG dropped -50.68% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VUG leads with 18.25% vs 15.55% for VOO. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VUG has performed better with a 18.25% return vs 15.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VUG and VOO have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.37% for VUG.

VUG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUG and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer