PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUG vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUG vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUG achieves a 5.40% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 24.23% return. Over the past 10 years, VUG has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 18.02%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.32% annualized return.


VUG

1D
-1.36%
1M
-1.70%
YTD
5.40%
6M
8.24%
1Y
22.75%
3Y*
23.06%
5Y*
13.77%
10Y*
18.02%

VGT

1D
-0.75%
1M
4.28%
YTD
24.23%
6M
28.20%
1Y
49.31%
3Y*
29.37%
5Y*
20.28%
10Y*
25.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUG vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
5.40%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
24.23%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between VUG and VGT is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.93

The correlation between VUG and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

VUG vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VUG
VGT

Technology

53.5%
98.5%

Communication Services

17.3%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
0.1%

Healthcare

4.6%
0.0%

Financial Services

4.3%
0.5%

Industrials

3.6%
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

1.5%

-

Real Estate

1.0%

-

Utilities

0.9%

-

Basic Materials

0.6%
0.0%

Energy

0.4%
0.3%

Technology

VUG
53.5%
VGT
98.5%

Communication Services

VUG
17.3%
VGT
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VUG
12.2%
VGT
0.1%

Healthcare

VUG
4.6%
VGT
0.0%

Financial Services

VUG
4.3%
VGT
0.5%

Industrials

VUG
3.6%
VGT
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

VUG
1.5%
VGT

-

Real Estate

VUG
1.0%
VGT

-

Utilities

VUG
0.9%
VGT

-

Basic Materials

VUG
0.6%
VGT
0.0%

Energy

VUG
0.4%
VGT
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUG vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUG vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VUGVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.37

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

3.02

-1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.74

9.29

-4.55

VUG vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUG and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VUG vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUG drawdown since its inception was -50.68%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUG and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUGVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.68%

-54.63%

+3.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.53%

-16.40%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.85%

-27.23%

+4.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.61%

-35.07%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.61%

-35.07%

-0.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.18%

-7.03%

+1.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.09%

-7.95%

+0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.81%

5.32%

-0.51%

Volatility

VUG vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) is 6.42%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 10.57%. This indicates that VUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUGVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.42%

10.57%

-4.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.29%

18.18%

-4.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.68%

22.28%

-5.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.35%

25.47%

-3.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.51%

24.76%

-3.25%

VUG vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VUG vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, more than VGT's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.33%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.39%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VUG and VGT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VGT has higher volatility (10.57%) compared to VUG (6.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VUG dropped -50.68% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.32% vs 18.02% for VUG. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VUG has been the lower-risk option at 6.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.32% return vs 18.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VGT.

VUG has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.

VUG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VUG and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUG and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer