KCDMY vs. LINC
KCDMY (Kimberly-Clark de Mexico) and LINC (Lincoln Educational Services Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — KCDMY in Household & Personal Products, LINC in Education & Training Services. Over the past 10 years, KCDMY returned 6.15%/yr vs 36.37%/yr for LINC. Their 0.13 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
KCDMY vs. LINC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KCDMY achieves a 11.58% return, which is significantly lower than LINC's 73.17% return. Over the past 10 years, KCDMY has underperformed LINC with an annualized return of 6.15%, while LINC has yielded a comparatively higher 36.37% annualized return.
KCDMY
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 5.25%
- 6M
- 7.37%
- YTD
- 11.58%
- 1Y
- 30.13%
- 3Y*
- 7.37%
- 5Y*
- 14.43%
- 10Y*
- 6.15%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.76%
LINC
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -20.08%
- 6M
- 56.86%
- YTD
- 73.17%
- 1Y
- 81.51%
- 3Y*
- 79.67%
- 5Y*
- 43.22%
- 10Y*
- 36.37%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $547.84K | $545.69K | $537.78K | |
| $20.68M | $26.87M | $27.43M |
KCDMY vs. LINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KCDMY Kimberly-Clark de Mexico | 11.58% | 55.77% | -28.48% | 40.30% | 15.89% | -3.90% | -9.84% | 29.96% | -4.95% | 4.36% |
LINC Lincoln Educational Services Corporation | 73.17% | 52.65% | 57.57% | 73.40% | -22.49% | 14.92% | 140.74% | -15.62% | 58.42% | 5.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between KCDMY and LINC is 0.10, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007 | 0.13 |
Fundamentals
KCDMY:
$7.00B
LINC:
$1.33B
KCDMY:
MX$13.20
LINC:
$0.72
KCDMY:
15.27
LINC:
58.42
KCDMY:
1.07
LINC:
2.05
KCDMY:
2.15
LINC:
2.40
KCDMY:
30.14
LINC:
6.59
KCDMY:
MX$56.19B
LINC:
$544.69M
KCDMY:
MX$22.74B
LINC:
$242.75M
KCDMY:
MX$15.13B
LINC:
$49.04M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KCDMY vs. LINC — Risk / Return Rank
KCDMY
LINC
KCDMY vs. LINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark de Mexico (KCDMY) and Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KCDMY | LINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.30 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 2.96 | -1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.83 | 7.21 | -2.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KCDMY vs. LINC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KCDMY drawdown since its inception was -74.61%, smaller than the maximum LINC drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCDMY and LINC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KCDMY | LINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.61% | -99.11% | +24.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.34% | -28.18% | +10.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.82% | -28.18% | -11.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.82% | -40.63% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.87% | -57.51% | +14.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.32% | -24.89% | -2.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.30% | -58.76% | +12.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.45% | 11.53% | -5.08% |
Volatility
KCDMY vs. LINC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kimberly-Clark de Mexico (KCDMY) is 4.52%, while Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) has a volatility of 21.08%. This indicates that KCDMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KCDMY | LINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 21.08% | -16.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.62% | 37.39% | -17.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.88% | 50.93% | -23.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.22% | 45.00% | -12.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.87% | 57.16% | -23.29% |
Dividends
KCDMY vs. LINC - Dividend Comparison
KCDMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, while LINC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KCDMY Kimberly-Clark de Mexico | 5.02% | 4.82% | 12.08% | 3.96% | 4.24% | 6.72% | 4.70% | 4.08% | 5.16% | 7.20% | 5.68% | 3.98% |
LINC Lincoln Educational Services Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
KCDMY vs. LINC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimberly-Clark de Mexico and Lincoln Educational Services Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KCDMY vs. LINC - Profitability Comparison
KCDMY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kimberly-Clark de Mexico reported a gross profit of 6.05B and revenue of 14.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.6%.
LINC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 143.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
KCDMY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kimberly-Clark de Mexico reported an operating income of 3.43B and revenue of 14.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.6%.
LINC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported an operating income of 6.41M and revenue of 143.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.
KCDMY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kimberly-Clark de Mexico reported a net income of 2.04B and revenue of 14.52B, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.
LINC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported a net income of 4.36M and revenue of 143.96M, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KCDMY and LINC have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LINC has higher volatility (21.08%) compared to KCDMY (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KCDMY dropped -74.61% vs LINC's -99.11%.
LINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KCDMY and LINC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer