LINC vs. MAMA
LINC (Lincoln Educational Services Corporation) and MAMA (Mama's Creations Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — LINC in Education & Training Services, MAMA in Packaged Foods. Over the past 10 years, LINC returned 36.37%/yr vs 42.87%/yr for MAMA. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LINC vs. MAMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LINC achieves a 73.17% return, which is significantly higher than MAMA's 36.62% return. Over the past 10 years, LINC has underperformed MAMA with an annualized return of 36.37%, while MAMA has yielded a comparatively higher 42.87% annualized return.
LINC
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -20.08%
- 6M
- 56.86%
- YTD
- 73.17%
- 1Y
- 81.51%
- 3Y*
- 79.67%
- 5Y*
- 43.22%
- 10Y*
- 36.37%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.74%
MAMA
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- 6M
- 22.05%
- YTD
- 36.62%
- 1Y
- 127.81%
- 3Y*
- 70.02%
- 5Y*
- 45.98%
- 10Y*
- 42.87%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.26%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $20.68M | $26.87M | $27.43M | |
| $8.44M | $10.86M | $10.24M |
LINC vs. MAMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LINC Lincoln Educational Services Corporation | 73.17% | 52.65% | 57.57% | 73.40% | -22.49% | 14.92% | 140.74% | -15.62% | 58.42% | 5.21% |
MAMA Mama's Creations Inc. | 36.62% | 69.47% | 62.12% | 173.54% | -10.70% | 12.29% | 47.93% | 75.36% | -46.92% | 80.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between LINC and MAMA is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2014 | 0.07 |
The correlation between LINC and MAMA shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.23 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LINC:
$1.33B
MAMA:
$754.56M
LINC:
$0.72
MAMA:
$0.14
LINC:
58.42
MAMA:
127.34
LINC:
2.05
MAMA:
3.77
LINC:
2.40
MAMA:
4.11
LINC:
6.59
MAMA:
14.42
LINC:
$544.69M
MAMA:
$189.23M
LINC:
$242.75M
MAMA:
$46.29M
LINC:
$49.04M
MAMA:
$11.97M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LINC vs. MAMA — Risk / Return Rank
LINC
MAMA
LINC vs. MAMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) and Mama's Creations Inc. (MAMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LINC | MAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.41 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.96 | 5.15 | -2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.21 | 12.59 | -5.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LINC vs. MAMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LINC drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, which is greater than MAMA's maximum drawdown of -89.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINC and MAMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LINC | MAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.11% | -89.83% | -9.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.18% | -24.05% | -4.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.18% | -42.54% | +14.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.63% | -64.79% | +24.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.51% | -79.35% | +21.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.89% | -10.75% | -14.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.76% | -45.40% | -13.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.53% | 9.82% | +1.71% |
Volatility
LINC vs. MAMA - Volatility Comparison
Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) has a higher volatility of 21.08% compared to Mama's Creations Inc. (MAMA) at 10.18%. This indicates that LINC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LINC | MAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.08% | 10.18% | +10.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.39% | 38.17% | -0.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.93% | 55.47% | -4.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.00% | 57.37% | -12.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.16% | 79.87% | -22.71% |
Dividends
LINC vs. MAMA - Dividend Comparison
Neither LINC nor MAMA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LINC vs. MAMA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lincoln Educational Services Corporation and Mama's Creations Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LINC vs. MAMA - Profitability Comparison
LINC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 143.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MAMA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mama's Creations Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.43M and revenue of 52.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.6%.
LINC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported an operating income of 6.41M and revenue of 143.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.
MAMA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mama's Creations Inc. reported an operating income of 2.66M and revenue of 52.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.1%.
LINC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported a net income of 4.36M and revenue of 143.96M, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.
MAMA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mama's Creations Inc. reported a net income of 2.06M and revenue of 52.77M, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LINC and MAMA have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LINC has higher volatility (21.08%) compared to MAMA (10.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LINC dropped -99.11% vs MAMA's -89.83%.
MAMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LINC and MAMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer