PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LINC vs. MAMA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


LINCMAMA
YTD Return53.59%60.69%
1Y Return63.69%121.63%
3Y Return (Ann)28.16%49.06%
Sharpe Ratio1.532.60
Sortino Ratio2.293.38
Omega Ratio1.281.37
Calmar Ratio1.015.53
Martin Ratio6.1817.40
Ulcer Index9.75%7.17%
Daily Std Dev39.29%47.94%
Max Drawdown-99.11%-64.79%
Current Drawdown-30.28%-7.07%

Fundamentals


LINCMAMA
Market Cap$531.93M$314.90M
EPS$0.25$0.13
PE Ratio67.6064.46
Total Revenue (TTM)$308.80M$84.95M
Gross Profit (TTM)$179.19M$22.16M
EBITDA (TTM)$16.71M$7.75M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between LINC and MAMA is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

LINC vs. MAMA - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LINC achieves a 53.59% return, which is significantly lower than MAMA's 60.69% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
29.69%
14.52%
LINC
MAMA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LINC vs. MAMA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) and Mama's Creations Inc. (MAMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LINC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LINC, currently valued at 1.53, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.53
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LINC, currently valued at 2.29, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.29
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LINC, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.28
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LINC, currently valued at 2.98, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.98
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LINC, currently valued at 6.18, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.006.18
MAMA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MAMA, currently valued at 2.60, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.60
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MAMA, currently valued at 3.38, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.38
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MAMA, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.37
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MAMA, currently valued at 5.53, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.005.53
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MAMA, currently valued at 17.40, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0017.40

LINC vs. MAMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LINC Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the MAMA Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LINC and MAMA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.53
2.60
LINC
MAMA

Dividends

LINC vs. MAMA - Dividend Comparison

Neither LINC nor MAMA has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LINC
Lincoln Educational Services Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%6.43%5.62%
MAMA
Mama's Creations Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LINC vs. MAMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LINC drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, which is greater than MAMA's maximum drawdown of -64.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINC and MAMA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-8.76%
-7.07%
LINC
MAMA

Volatility

LINC vs. MAMA - Volatility Comparison

Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) has a higher volatility of 16.15% compared to Mama's Creations Inc. (MAMA) at 14.72%. This indicates that LINC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
16.15%
14.72%
LINC
MAMA

Financials

LINC vs. MAMA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lincoln Educational Services Corporation and Mama's Creations Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items