PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LINC vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LINC vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LINC vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LINC
Lincoln Educational Services Corporation
73.71%52.65%57.57%73.40%-22.49%14.92%140.74%-15.62%58.42%5.21%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-3.66%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LINC achieves a 73.71% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -3.66% return. Over the past 10 years, LINC has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 32.69%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 14.14% annualized return.


LINC

1D
3.12%
1M
13.90%
YTD
73.71%
6M
81.76%
1Y
159.59%
3Y*
94.97%
5Y*
45.29%
10Y*
32.69%

VOO

1D
0.79%
1M
-4.29%
YTD
-3.66%
6M
-1.41%
1Y
18.17%
3Y*
18.58%
5Y*
11.93%
10Y*
14.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LINC vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LINC
LINC Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
LINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
LINC Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
LINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
LINC Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LINC vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LINCVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.50

1.01

+2.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.70

1.53

+2.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.23

+0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.01

1.55

+4.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.81

7.31

+9.50

LINC vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LINC Sharpe Ratio is 3.50, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LINC and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LINCVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.50

1.01

+2.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

0.71

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.79

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.83

-0.76

Correlation

The correlation between LINC and VOO is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

LINC vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

LINC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LINC
Lincoln Educational Services Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.18%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Drawdowns

LINC vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LINC drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINC and VOO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LINCVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.11%

-33.99%

-65.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.35%

-11.98%

-15.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.96%

-24.52%

-17.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.51%

-33.99%

-23.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.55%

+5.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.57%

-3.72%

-55.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.78%

2.55%

+7.23%

Volatility

LINC vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) has a higher volatility of 10.99% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.34%. This indicates that LINC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LINCVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.99%

5.34%

+5.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.66%

9.47%

+24.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.90%

18.11%

+27.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.27%

16.82%

+26.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.34%

17.99%

+39.35%