LINC vs. IESC
LINC (Lincoln Educational Services Corporation) and IESC (IES Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. LINC operates in Education & Training Services (Consumer Defensive), while IESC operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, LINC returned 36.37%/yr vs 48.90%/yr for IESC. Their 0.16 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LINC vs. IESC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LINC achieves a 73.17% return, which is significantly lower than IESC's 91.39% return. Over the past 10 years, LINC has underperformed IESC with an annualized return of 36.37%, while IESC has yielded a comparatively higher 48.90% annualized return.
LINC
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -20.08%
- 6M
- 56.86%
- YTD
- 73.17%
- 1Y
- 81.51%
- 3Y*
- 79.67%
- 5Y*
- 43.22%
- 10Y*
- 36.37%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.74%
IESC
- 1D
- 30.27%
- 1M
- 13.84%
- 6M
- 95.78%
- YTD
- 91.39%
- 1Y
- 112.48%
- 3Y*
- 134.42%
- 5Y*
- 68.75%
- 10Y*
- 48.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.92%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $133.30M | $144.24M | $175.40M | |
| $20.68M | $26.87M | $27.43M |
LINC vs. IESC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LINC Lincoln Educational Services Corporation | 73.17% | 52.65% | 57.57% | 73.40% | -22.49% | 14.92% | 140.74% | -15.62% | 58.42% | 5.21% |
IESC IES Holdings, Inc. | 91.39% | 93.58% | 153.67% | 122.72% | -29.76% | 9.99% | 79.42% | 65.02% | -9.86% | -9.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between LINC and IESC is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2005 | 0.16 |
The correlation between LINC and IESC shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.26 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LINC:
$1.33B
IESC:
$14.83B
LINC:
$0.72
IESC:
$27.72
LINC:
58.42
IESC:
26.86
LINC:
2.05
IESC:
0.32
LINC:
2.40
IESC:
3.77
LINC:
6.59
IESC:
12.23
LINC:
$544.69M
IESC:
$3.99B
LINC:
$242.75M
IESC:
$1.03B
LINC:
$49.04M
IESC:
$582.79M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LINC vs. IESC — Risk / Return Rank
LINC
IESC
LINC vs. IESC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) and IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LINC | IESC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.28 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.96 | 3.16 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.21 | 11.65 | -4.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LINC vs. IESC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LINC drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, roughly equal to the maximum IESC drawdown of -98.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINC and IESC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LINC | IESC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.11% | -98.78% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.18% | -35.26% | +7.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.18% | -49.23% | +21.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.63% | -54.22% | +13.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.51% | -54.28% | -3.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.89% | -2.87% | -22.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.76% | -54.78% | -3.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.53% | 9.56% | +1.97% |
Volatility
LINC vs. IESC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) is 21.08%, while IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) has a volatility of 37.94%. This indicates that LINC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IESC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LINC | IESC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.08% | 37.94% | -16.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.39% | 61.10% | -23.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.93% | 73.89% | -22.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.00% | 57.05% | -12.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.16% | 49.51% | +7.65% |
Dividends
LINC vs. IESC - Dividend Comparison
Neither LINC nor IESC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LINC vs. IESC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lincoln Educational Services Corporation and IES Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LINC vs. IESC - Profitability Comparison
LINC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 143.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
IESC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 340.66M and revenue of 1.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.
LINC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported an operating income of 6.41M and revenue of 143.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.
IESC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 178.55M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.
LINC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported a net income of 4.36M and revenue of 143.96M, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.
IESC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 256.13M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in a net margin of 20.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LINC and IESC have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IESC has higher volatility (37.94%) compared to LINC (21.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LINC dropped -99.11% vs IESC's -98.78%.
LINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LINC and IESC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer