KCDMY vs. RNMBY
KCDMY (Kimberly-Clark de Mexico) and RNMBY (Rheinmetall AG ADR) are both stocks. KCDMY operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while RNMBY operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, KCDMY returned 5.33%/yr vs 37.34%/yr for RNMBY. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KCDMY vs. RNMBY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KCDMY achieves a 4.49% return, which is significantly higher than RNMBY's -23.30% return. Over the past 10 years, KCDMY has underperformed RNMBY with an annualized return of 5.33%, while RNMBY has yielded a comparatively higher 37.34% annualized return.
KCDMY
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 4.49%
- 6M
- 7.81%
- 1Y
- 32.34%
- 3Y*
- 9.43%
- 5Y*
- 11.08%
- 10Y*
- 5.33%
RNMBY
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -12.78%
- YTD
- -23.30%
- 6M
- -21.38%
- 1Y
- -33.14%
- 3Y*
- 76.84%
- 5Y*
- 69.62%
- 10Y*
- 37.34%
KCDMY vs. RNMBY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KCDMY Kimberly-Clark de Mexico | 4.49% | 55.77% | -28.48% | 40.30% | 15.89% | -3.90% | -9.84% | 29.96% | -4.95% | 4.36% |
RNMBY Rheinmetall AG ADR | -23.30% | 190.28% | 99.83% | 63.35% | 122.00% | -13.84% | -2.03% | 28.14% | -29.38% | 98.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between KCDMY and RNMBY is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2012 | 0.12 |
Fundamentals
KCDMY:
$6.63B
RNMBY:
$64.74B
KCDMY:
$12.88
RNMBY:
$3.56
KCDMY:
0.86
RNMBY:
77.84
KCDMY:
0.06
RNMBY:
3.56
KCDMY:
0.12
RNMBY:
5.86
KCDMY:
2.65
RNMBY:
12.12
KCDMY:
$55.74B
RNMBY:
$9.58B
KCDMY:
$22.07B
RNMBY:
$4.12B
KCDMY:
$14.69B
RNMBY:
$1.81B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KCDMY vs. RNMBY — Risk / Return Rank
KCDMY
RNMBY
KCDMY vs. RNMBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark de Mexico (KCDMY) and Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KCDMY | RNMBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 0.90 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | -0.75 | +3.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.59 | -1.72 | +8.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KCDMY | RNMBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | -0.71 | +1.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 1.56 | -1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | 0.90 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.80 | -0.76 |
Drawdowns
KCDMY vs. RNMBY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KCDMY drawdown since its inception was -74.61%, which is greater than RNMBY's maximum drawdown of -67.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCDMY and RNMBY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KCDMY | RNMBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.61% | -67.75% | -6.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.77% | -44.06% | +31.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.82% | -44.06% | +4.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.82% | -44.06% | +4.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.87% | -67.75% | +24.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.94% | -40.10% | +8.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.44% | -16.69% | -29.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.92% | 19.29% | -14.37% |
Volatility
KCDMY vs. RNMBY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kimberly-Clark de Mexico (KCDMY) is 6.56%, while Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY) has a volatility of 17.60%. This indicates that KCDMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RNMBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KCDMY | RNMBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.56% | 17.60% | -11.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.08% | 34.43% | -14.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.50% | 46.66% | -19.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.30% | 44.76% | -12.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.06% | 41.55% | -7.49% |
Dividends
KCDMY vs. RNMBY - Dividend Comparison
KCDMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than RNMBY's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KCDMY Kimberly-Clark de Mexico | 4.97% | 4.82% | 12.08% | 3.96% | 4.24% | 6.72% | 4.70% | 4.08% | 5.16% | 7.20% | 5.68% | 3.98% |
RNMBY Rheinmetall AG ADR | 0.98% | 0.49% | 0.96% | 1.46% | 1.82% | 1.72% | 1.56% | 1.36% | 1.47% | 2.06% | 2.97% | 0.53% |
Financials
KCDMY vs. RNMBY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimberly-Clark de Mexico and Rheinmetall AG ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KCDMY vs. RNMBY - Profitability Comparison
KCDMY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark de Mexico reported a gross profit of 5.98B and revenue of 14.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.0%.
RNMBY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported a gross profit of 430.97M and revenue of 1.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.9%.
KCDMY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark de Mexico reported an operating income of 3.39B and revenue of 14.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.2%.
RNMBY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported an operating income of 178.89M and revenue of 1.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.
KCDMY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark de Mexico reported a net income of 2.06B and revenue of 14.59B, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.
RNMBY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported a net income of 112.83M and revenue of 1.97B, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KCDMY and RNMBY have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RNMBY has higher volatility (17.60%) compared to KCDMY (6.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KCDMY dropped -74.61% vs RNMBY's -67.75%.
KCDMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KCDMY and RNMBY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer